BUMP STOCK CASE: ATF Admits To Supreme Court It Changed Definitions...Because
This video analyzes the ATF's filing in the Garland v. Cargill Supreme Court case concerning bump stocks. It highlights the ATF's admission of changing definitions without congressional action and discusses the historical context of machine gun legislation. The speaker argues the ATF's reclassification of bump stocks as machine guns, particularly the shift from 'single pull' to 'single function' of the trigger, was an administrative overreach to ban the device.











