Crying Chucky Schumer Asks DOJ & ATF To Redefine "Firearm" Because "Ghost Guns"

Published on February 17, 2020
Duration: 7:52

This video critically analyzes Senator Chuck Schumer's request to the DOJ and ATF to redefine 'firearm' to include components like 80% lowers and individual parts. The speaker, identified as Jared from Guns & Gadgets, argues this is a move towards registration and eventual confiscation, likening it to car part regulations. He highlights the potential impact on AR and AK builds and criticizes the logic behind requiring background checks for firearm components.

Quick Summary

Senator Chuck Schumer has requested the DOJ and ATF redefine 'firearm' to include components like 80% lowers, citing concerns about 'ghost guns.' The speaker argues this is a move towards registration and confiscation, criticizing the logic of regulating individual parts and drawing parallels to less regulated car parts.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Intro and Sponsor Segment
  2. 00:47Schumer's Firearm Redefinition Goal
  3. 01:03Schumer Appeals to DOJ & ATF
  4. 01:19Push for Part Registration and Background Checks
  5. 02:08Critique of Schumer's Logic on Parts
  6. 02:49Schumer's Letter to DOJ and ATF
  7. 03:42Hypotheticals and Political BS
  8. 04:17Schumer's Specific Demands
  9. 05:34ATF Legal Challenges and Current Definition
  10. 06:36Schumer's True Intent: Confiscation
  11. 07:35Outro and Call to Action

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Senator Schumer's main request regarding firearms?

Senator Chuck Schumer has asked the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to redefine the term 'firearm.' He specifically wants the definition of 'firearm frame or receiver' to include any part that houses the trigger group or can be converted into an operable firearm, impacting items like 80% lowers and components for AR/AK builds.

Why does Schumer want to redefine 'firearm'?

Schumer's stated concern is the proliferation of 'ghost guns' – untraceable firearms assembled from parts. He believes redefining 'firearm' to include components will allow for background checks on these parts, preventing them from falling into the wrong hands and addressing what he calls an 'imminent threat'.

What is the speaker's perspective on Schumer's proposal?

The speaker, Jared from Guns & Gadgets, views Schumer's proposal as a 'smoke screen' for gun registration and eventual confiscation. He argues the logic is flawed, comparing it to regulating car parts, and believes it's an overreach that infringes on Second Amendment rights.

What are the potential legal implications of Schumer's request?

If enacted, Schumer's request could lead to individual firearm components like pistol grips and lower receivers being classified as firearms, requiring background checks and registration. This could significantly impact the ability of law-abiding citizens to build their own firearms.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News

View all →