Dana Loesch on Justice with Judge Jeanine

Published on October 11, 2017
Duration: 5:28

NRA spokesperson Dana Loesch argues that gun control measures are ineffective and do not deter criminals. She highlights instances in California and Chicago where gun control has failed to reduce violence and criticizes the lack of prosecution for felony gun crimes. Loesch also questions the focus on items like bump stocks, suggesting the true goal of gun control advocates is unclear and potentially aimed at disarming law-abiding citizens.

Quick Summary

NRA spokesperson Dana Loesch asserts that gun control is ineffective because it fails to compel criminal cooperation. She cites examples from California and Chicago where gun control measures did not reduce violence and criticizes the lack of prosecution for gun crimes. Loesch questions the focus on items like bump stocks, suggesting the true aim of gun control advocates is unclear and potentially targets law-abiding citizens.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction & Gun Control Debate
  2. 00:10Ineffectiveness of Gun Control
  3. 00:47California's Failed Gun Control
  4. 01:15Semi-Automatic Weapons Ban Impact
  5. 01:31Goal of Gun Control Advocates
  6. 01:48Criticism of Hillary Clinton
  7. 02:17Chicago Gun Crime Statistics
  8. 02:40Fast and Furious Operation
  9. 03:13Hollywood Violence vs. Gun Laws
  10. 03:34Bump Stock Discussion
  11. 04:03ATF Consistency & Gun Control Advocates
  12. 04:12Voter Priorities: Reciprocity & Hearing Protection Act
  13. 04:30Caution to Americans
  14. 04:44Hypocrisy of Gun Control Advocates
  15. 05:05Bump Stock Impact Revisited
  16. 05:13Lives Saved vs. Lives Lost

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does Dana Loesch believe gun control is ineffective?

Dana Loesch argues that gun control measures are ineffective because they do not address how to elicit cooperation from criminals. She points to instances in California and Chicago where gun control has failed to reduce violence and criticizes the lack of prosecution for gun crimes, suggesting the focus should be on enforcing existing laws rather than creating new ones.

What is Dana Loesch's stance on bump stocks?

Dana Loesch states that bump stocks make a rifle less accurate and have had no impact on crimes in America. She notes that their use in the Las Vegas shooting is uncertain and suggests that focusing on bump stocks distracts from more significant issues related to gun violence and law enforcement.

What are the key criticisms Dana Loesch has regarding gun control advocates?

Dana Loesch criticizes gun control advocates for their unclear ultimate goals, suggesting they may aim to disarm law-abiding citizens rather than genuinely reduce crime. She also points out the hypocrisy of some advocates who push for gun control while potentially benefiting from armed security or personal protection.

What legislative priorities does Dana Loesch mention that voters supported?

Dana Loesch highlights that American voters, in the November elections, supported national reciprocity and the Hearing Protection Act. She urges Congress to listen to these voter mandates and act on them, rather than pursuing what she views as ineffective gun control measures.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from NRA

View all →