DC Carry Law Upheld as Unconstitutional

Published on October 1, 2017
Duration: 4:26

The DC carry law requiring a 'good cause' for concealed carry licenses has been ruled unconstitutional by the US Court of Appeals in Wren v. DC. Despite this ruling, DC officials have instructed the DC Metro Police Department to continue enforcing the unconstitutional law, with a potential appeal to the US Supreme Court expected.

Quick Summary

The US Court of Appeals ruled in Wren v. DC that Washington D.C.'s 'good cause' requirement for concealed carry licenses is unconstitutional. However, DC officials have directed the DC Metro Police Department to continue enforcing the law, with a potential appeal to the US Supreme Court expected.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction and Second Amendment Victory
  2. 00:12Wren v. DC Case Overview
  3. 00:21DC's Good Cause Requirement
  4. 01:05Court of Appeals Ruling
  5. 01:20Reactions to the Ruling
  6. 01:42En Banc Rehearing Denial
  7. 02:09Continued Enforcement by DC
  8. 02:34Current Legal Standing
  9. 03:05Potential Supreme Court Appeal
  10. 03:13DC Metro PD's Stance
  11. 03:46Conclusion and Call to Action

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the outcome of the Wren v. DC case regarding Washington D.C.'s carry law?

The US Court of Appeals ruled in Wren v. DC that Washington D.C.'s 'good cause' requirement for concealed carry licenses is unconstitutional. This means individuals no longer need to prove a specific reason beyond self-defense to obtain a permit.

Is the DC carry law still being enforced after the Wren v. DC ruling?

Yes, despite the court ruling the law unconstitutional, DC officials have instructed the DC Metro Police Department to continue enforcing the 'good cause' requirement. This situation is expected to lead to further legal action, potentially an appeal to the US Supreme Court.

What is the 'good cause' requirement for concealed carry in Washington D.C.?

Historically, Washington D.C. required applicants for concealed carry licenses to demonstrate a 'good cause,' which was broadly interpreted by authorities and often led to denials for most individuals seeking to carry a firearm for self-defense.

What is the significance of the denial of an en banc rehearing in the Wren v. DC case?

The denial of an en banc rehearing means the full panel of judges on the DC Court of Appeals declined to review the initial two-to-one ruling. This allows the original decision, deeming the 'good cause' requirement unconstitutional, to stand for now.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News

View all →