DOJ Gets Handed a Major Defeat on a Gun Law

This video discusses the Department of Justice's request for an extension in the Brian Range v. Merrick Garland case, which challenges federal law 18 USC 922 G1 regarding felons possessing firearms. The speaker, Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney, analyzes potential reasons for the delay, including the confirmation of a new Solicitor General and the strategic implications of other pending cases. He advocates for the Trump administration to follow the 'Windsor precedent' by seeking certiorari, arguing that the DOJ should defend the enforcement of the law while simultaneously urging the Supreme Court to rule in favor of the defendant, thereby establishing a clear constitutional standard for non-violent felons.

This video analyzes the Supreme Court case United States v. Rahimi, focusing on the Department of Justice's arguments regarding 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), which prohibits individuals subject to domestic violence restraining orders from possessing firearms. The speaker, Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney, argues that the DOJ has exaggerated the public safety importance of this law, presenting data that shows very low conviction rates for violations of § 922(g)(8) compared to other federal firearms statutes like § 922(g)(1) concerning felons in possession. The analysis highlights the legal arguments concerning Second Amendment rights and historical analysis, as well as the DOJ's strategic choices in pursuing this case.

This video provides an in-depth analysis of cases concerning Second Amendment rights before the Supreme Court. It details 'the group of five' critical cases, including challenges to magazine and assault weapon bans, and highlights new cases like 'Gardner v. Maryland' addressing interstate travel with firearms and 'Peterson v. United States' challenging the NFA. The speaker, William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, emphasizes the importance of understanding these legal developments for gun owners.

This video from Washington Gun Law TV, hosted by William Kirk, analyzes why many believe the Supreme Court disregards Second Amendment rights. It examines the court's handling of cases like Wolford v. Lopez and Shenenthal v. Raul, focusing on how the court manages its caseload and the implications for Second Amendment jurisprudence. The discussion highlights the court's decisions on place and people restrictions, suggesting a pattern of rejecting cases that could clarify or strengthen gun rights.

The Trump Department of Justice filed a brief with the Supreme Court in the case of Vincent v. Bondi. The brief argues that the Supreme Court should deny cert, not because Ms. Vincent lacks a strong case for Second Amendment rights restoration, but because an administrative process, established by Attorney General Pam Bondi under 18 USC 925C, now exists for individuals like her to regain their rights. This strategy aims to avoid potentially unfavorable precedent from the Supreme Court on the interpretation of 18 USC 922G concerning non-violent felons and the Second Amendment.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed a brief arguing that a non-violent felon, Brian Range, can still be disarmed under the Second Amendment, citing the Rahimi decision. The speaker contends the DOJ's arguments fail to distinguish between violence and non-violence, misinterpret the Rahimi holding's requirements for court findings of credible threats, and improperly apply historical legal precedents. The case is being considered by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, with potential for further appeal to the Supreme Court.

William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law and a practicing attorney, provides expert guidance on how to legally respond if your vehicle is surrounded by a mob. He emphasizes understanding the nuances of self-defense laws, particularly concerning the use of force, and stresses that the primary goal should always be de-escalation and safe escape when possible. The instruction highlights the critical difference between property damage and threats to human life when justifying defensive actions.

This video, featuring legal expert William Kirk, delves into the complex legalities of using deadly force against law enforcement officers when faced with unlawful aggression. It clarifies the foundational principles of self-defense, including necessity, reasonableness, and proportionality, and outlines the four legal justifications for employing lethal force. The discussion highlights the protections afforded by the Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground laws, particularly within one's home, and differentiates between the legal right to self-defense and the tactical considerations of engaging with law enforcement.

This video features William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, an expert in firearms law, discussing the growing trend of county sheriffs and state associations opposing federal gun control measures. The primary focus is on Arkansas, detailing Act 1012 and Arkansas Code 21-1-904, which aim to prevent state cooperation with federal enforcement of certain firearms regulations, particularly the ATF's rule on pistol stabilizing braces.

William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, provides expert insights into ATF firearm inspection authority. He clarifies that the ATF cannot demand inspections of non-NFA firearms or NFA items without a warrant, dispelling common misconceptions about Fourth Amendment rights for firearm owners. The video emphasizes that FFLs have different inspection rules than private citizens.