Fridays At 5: Episode 5 8/31/18

This episode of CRPA TV's 'Friday at Five' discusses recent legislative actions concerning Second Amendment rights in California. It highlights Governor Brown's vetoes of bills that would have banned gun shows and restricted hunting trophy imports, while noting the signing of SB 1100, which raises the firearm purchase age to 21. The segment also features student activism for the Second Amendment and discusses the upcoming gubernatorial race.

This CRPA TV episode, "Fridays at 5 Episode 6," focuses on Second Amendment news. Key topics include the ongoing situation at the Del Mar gun show, significant legislative bills awaiting the governor's signature, and upcoming fall events hosted by the organization. The description also provides links to the CRPA website for events and specific actions like saving the Del Mar show, along with Governor Brown's contact information for advocacy.

This video discusses Governor Brown's veto of SB 464, a bill that proposed increased security requirements for licensed firearms dealers. The description highlights that the compliance costs associated with the bill would have forced numerous small businesses to close. The content emphasizes that the bill's defeat was a result of dedicated advocacy and support from viewers.

This YouTube video discusses the signing of California Senate Bill 620 by Governor Brown. The description expresses concern that this legislation reduces penalties for firearms crimes, which the uploader believes is counterproductive to reducing crime and places an increasing burden on law-abiding gun owners through stricter regulations, while criminals supposedly benefit from leniency. The content focuses on the perceived negative impact of this law on responsible firearm owners.

This video discusses California's ban on lead ammunition for hunting, effective July 1, 2019. It highlights concerns about lead vapor exposure being more dangerous than ingesting lead from game meat. The discussion also touches on the increased cost of non-lead alternatives and the potential economic impact of such bans, citing an NSSF report. The speakers express skepticism about the effectiveness of the ban for hunting while acknowledging the broader implications for firearm owners.

This video discusses the Supreme Court's decision to overturn the Chevron Doctrine, which previously granted deference to federal agencies' interpretations of statutes. CRPA President Chuck Michelle explains how this impacts agencies like the ATF, potentially limiting their ability to enact regulations without clear statutory authority. The discussion also covers recent SCOTUS decisions on Second Amendment cases, including the denial of cert in Illinois gun ban cases and the GVR (Grant, Vacate, Remand) of cases in light of the Rahimi decision, signaling a shift in how gun rights litigation may proceed.

This video discusses President Trump's executive order aimed at reviewing and potentially reversing actions that may infringe upon Second Amendment rights. Rick Travis, CRPA Legislative Director, breaks down the order's implications, focusing on the Attorney General's role in examining regulations, particularly those concerning 'ghost guns' (DIY firearm kits) and age restrictions. The discussion also touches upon the potential impact of the order on existing Second Amendment lawsuits and the role of state governments in challenging federal actions.

This video provides an expert overview of key California firearm laws and regulations taking effect in 2025 and beyond, presented by attorney Matt Cabero. It details changes to firearm storage requirements, the impact of the ammunition tax, and updates to CCW permit processes. The discussion highlights the efforts of organizations like CRPA in shaping legislation and regulatory outcomes.

This video discusses two lawsuits challenging California laws that prohibit firearm, ammunition, and precursor part sales on state-owned properties, specifically targeting gun shows at the Del Mar Fairgrounds and OC Fair and Event Center. The discussion highlights the legal arguments presented at the Ninth Circuit, including First and Second Amendment claims, and the differing outcomes in the lower courts. It also touches upon the perceived bias of the judicial panel and the strategic considerations in arguing such cases.