GOA's Larry Pratt on CNN

Published on June 26, 2015
Duration: 5:23

Larry Pratt, Executive Director of Gun Owners of America, discusses the issue of gun control in the wake of the Charleston church shooting. He argues that 'gun-free zones' are ineffective and that armed citizens could have prevented or mitigated such tragedies. Pratt cites historical incidents where armed individuals stopped mass shootings and questions the validity of comparing US gun violence rates to other countries, pointing to incidents in England and France.

Quick Summary

Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America argues that 'gun-free zones' are ineffective and facilitate mass shootings by disarming law-abiding citizens. He believes that the presence of armed individuals at potential attack sites could deter or stop assailants, citing historical incidents and questioning the efficacy of gun control in other countries.

Chapters

  1. 00:01Introduction to Gun Control Debate
  2. 00:20Charleston Shooting and Gun Control Views
  3. 00:33Gun-Free Zones as Facilitators of Violence
  4. 01:36Role of Armed Citizens in Preventing Attacks
  5. 02:01Safety in Places of Worship and Schools
  6. 02:16Theological Perspective on Defense
  7. 02:42Community Reaction to Tragedy
  8. 03:09Eliminating Gun-Free Zones
  9. 03:14Hypothetical Scenario in Church
  10. 03:29Clackamas Mall Incident Example
  11. 03:45Darby, PA Hospital Shooting Example
  12. 04:02Comparison with Other Developed Countries
  13. 04:32Gun Violence Statistics in England and France
  14. 05:00Murder Rate Comparison: UK vs. US County

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Larry Pratt's main argument regarding gun-free zones?

Larry Pratt, Executive Director of Gun Owners of America, argues that 'gun-free zones' are ineffective and actually facilitate mass shootings. He believes that these zones disarm law-abiding citizens, leaving them vulnerable to attackers who deliberately choose such locations for minimal resistance.

How does Pratt suggest mass shootings could be prevented?

Pratt suggests that mass shootings could be prevented or their casualties significantly reduced if legally armed citizens were present at the scene. He posits that immediate resistance from armed individuals could deter or stop an attacker before they inflict widespread harm.

What examples does Pratt use to support his claims?

Pratt cites the Clackamas Mall incident and a shooting at a psychiatric hospital in Darby, Pennsylvania, as examples where armed citizens (one legally carrying, one illegally) were able to stop or confront attackers. He also references mass shootings in England and France to question the effectiveness of strict gun control.

What is the Gun Owners of America's stance on gun control in the US?

Gun Owners of America, represented by Larry Pratt, advocates against stricter gun control measures, particularly the establishment of 'gun-free zones.' They believe in the right to self-defense and that armed citizens are a crucial deterrent against violent crime.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Gun Owners of America

View all →