Gun Gripes #175: "Trump's Bump Stock Ban"

Published on January 9, 2019
Duration: 28:19

This video discusses President Trump's ban on bump stocks, enacted via executive order by directing the ATF to redefine 'machine gun' to include them. The hosts express strong disagreement, arguing it sets a dangerous precedent and bypasses Congress. They highlight the legal challenges initiated by the Gun Owners of America (GOA) and Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC), while criticizing the NRA's support for the ban. The discussion emphasizes the importance of fighting for Second Amendment rights and supporting organizations actively engaged in litigation.

Quick Summary

President Trump's administration, through the ATF, redefined 'machine gun' to include bump stocks, a move criticized for bypassing Congress and setting a dangerous precedent. Organizations like GOA and FPC are actively challenging this ban through lawsuits, while the NRA's support for the ban has drawn significant criticism from gun rights advocates.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the primary criticism leveled against the NRA regarding the bump stock ban?

The primary criticism is that the NRA supported the ban, which many gun rights advocates view as a compromise on Second Amendment principles. Critics argue the NRA has become more of a 'lifestyle brand' than a staunch defender of gun rights, failing to uphold zero compromise.

Which organizations are actively challenging the bump stock ban through legal means?

The Gun Owners of America (GOA) and the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) are the main organizations that have stepped up and submitted formal lawsuits against the bump stock ban, actively fighting it in court.

Why is the redefinition of 'machine gun' to include bump stocks considered a dangerous precedent?

It's considered dangerous because it sets a precedent where executive powers can redefine existing firearm classifications without congressional approval. This could potentially be used in the future to arbitrarily classify other semi-automatic firearms as machine guns, eroding Second Amendment rights.

What was the ATF's previous stance on bump stocks before the ban?

Previously, the ATF had issued opinion letters classifying bump stocks as legal accessories. This was based on the understanding that they did not contain an internal spring mechanism to function as a machine gun, with the user's finger acting as the 'spring'.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Iraqveteran8888

View all →