HUGE BREAKING NEWS: TRUMP DOJ GRANTS 2A PRECEDENT SETTING VICTORY!

Published on July 1, 2025
Duration: 16:13

This video discusses a significant legal victory for Second Amendment rights, where the Trump Department of Justice, through the Solicitor General, chose not to seek Supreme Court review of a Fifth Circuit ruling. This ruling declared a federal law prohibiting 18-20 year olds from acquiring handguns from FFLs unconstitutional. The speaker emphasizes the precedent-setting nature of this decision, highlighting it as a major win for gun rights advocates.

Quick Summary

The Trump Department of Justice, through the Solicitor General, has effectively conceded Second Amendment rights for 18-20 year olds by not seeking Supreme Court review of a Fifth Circuit ruling. This ruling declared a federal law prohibiting handgun acquisition for this age group unconstitutional, establishing a significant precedent.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Breaking News: DOJ Concedes 2A Rights for 18-20 Year Olds
  2. 00:39Host Mark Smith Introduces the Topic
  3. 01:04Fifth Circuit Ruling on Handgun Acquisition
  4. 02:12DOJ's Decision Not to Seek Certiorari
  5. 03:08Significance of the DOJ's Concession
  6. 04:02Comparison to the Ree Case and Range Case
  7. 05:00Extraordinary Nature of the Solicitor General's Decision
  8. 05:33Trump Administration's Pro-Second Amendment Stance
  9. 09:15Rebutting the Argument for Seeking Cert
  10. 10:01Judge William Pryor's Ruling and Supreme Court Uncertainty
  11. 11:04Historical Arguments for 18-20 Year Olds' Rights
  12. 13:28Distinction from the Brian Range Case
  13. 15:05Credit to the Trump Administration and DOJ

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the significance of the Trump DOJ not seeking Supreme Court review in the Ree case?

The Trump DOJ's decision not to seek Supreme Court review effectively concedes that 18, 19, and 20-year-olds are entitled to full Second Amendment rights. This allows the Fifth Circuit's ruling, which declared a federal law prohibiting handgun acquisition for this age group unconstitutional, to stand as binding precedent.

Which federal law was challenged and declared unconstitutional by the Fifth Circuit in the Ree case?

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals declared unconstitutional a federal gun control law that prohibited 18, 19, and 20-year-olds from acquiring handguns from Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs). This ruling was not just 'as applied' but 'facially' unconstitutional.

Why is the Ree case considered a bigger deal than the Brian Range case for Second Amendment rights?

The Ree case is a bigger deal because it involved a facial challenge to a federal statute, meaning the law was deemed unconstitutional in all instances. In contrast, the Brian Range case ruling was 'as applied' to an individual, though still precedential.

What historical arguments support Second Amendment rights for 18-20 year olds?

Historical arguments include the Militia Act of 1792, which considered 18-20 year olds part of the militia obligated to bring their own firearms. Furthermore, the principle that minors can be disarmed doesn't apply to adults aged 18-20, who have adult rights and responsibilities.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from The Four Boxes Diner

View all →