"I Can Tell You're Not A Gun Owner" GOA Defends 2A On C-SPAN

Published on February 21, 2026
Duration: 5:24

Erich Pratt of Gun Owners of America (GOA) articulates a strong defense of Second Amendment rights on C-SPAN, arguing against arbitrary ammunition limits and comparing gun rights to First Amendment freedoms. He emphasizes that restrictions should target dangerous individuals, not law-abiding citizens, and highlights the ineffectiveness of gun control in preventing crime. Pratt also draws parallels between gun ownership and car usage, noting fewer regulations on vehicles despite their potential for harm.

Quick Summary

Erich Pratt of Gun Owners of America argues on C-SPAN that the Second Amendment's protection of the right to keep and bear arms "shall not be infringed" means there should be no limits on ammunition. He likens gun rights to free speech, advocating for punishment of misuse rather than prior restriction, and stresses that focusing on keeping dangerous individuals out of the justice system is key, not restricting law-abiding citizens.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Ammo Limits & Second Amendment
  2. 00:17Dangerous People & Justice System
  3. 00:44First Amendment Comparison
  4. 01:09Constitutional Carry & Criminals
  5. 01:53Car Driving Analogy for Rights
  6. 02:11God-Given Right to Self-Protection
  7. 02:35Gun vs. Car Regulations
  8. 03:412A & Modern Technology
  9. 04:44Defense Against Tyranny
  10. 05:07Gun Ownership Privacy Concerns

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the Second Amendment allow for limits on ammunition?

According to Erich Pratt of Gun Owners of America, the Second Amendment states that the right to keep and bear arms "shall not be infringed," implying no restrictions should be placed on ammunition. He argues that focusing on ammunition limits is a misguided approach to public safety.

How does Erich Pratt compare gun rights to free speech?

Erich Pratt compares gun rights to the First Amendment's protection of free speech. He uses the analogy that while you can't yell 'fire' in a crowded theater, individuals are punished for misusing speech, not gagged beforehand. He suggests a similar logic should apply to the Second Amendment, punishing misuse rather than restricting ownership.

What is the argument against restricting firearms for law-abiding citizens?

The argument is that dangerous individuals will always find ways to obtain weapons, regardless of restrictions. Erich Pratt emphasizes that focusing on the justice system to keep dangerous people off the streets is more effective than limiting the rights of law-abiding citizens who pose no threat.

Are there fewer regulations on cars than guns?

Yes, Erich Pratt argues there are fewer regulations on car ownership and use than on firearms. He notes that while one can drive with a state license, carrying a concealed weapon nationwide is complex due to varying state laws, and cars do not require fingerprinting or background checks for purchase.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Gun Owners of America

View all →