It's Not About Bump Stocks, It's About Shall Not Be Infringed

Published on January 24, 2018
Duration: 2:21

This video from Gun Owners of America discusses the ATF's potential regulation of bump stocks, arguing it sets a dangerous precedent for regulating other firearm accessories like magazines. It highlights the lack of a 'standard rate of fire' and emphasizes the importance of public comment periods, referencing a past success with M855 ammunition regulation. The organization urges viewers to submit comments to the ATF and prepare for further action.

Quick Summary

Gun Owners of America argues that regulating bump stocks based on rate of fire is problematic as there's no standard. They warn of a 'slippery slope' where accessories like magazines could be targeted next. Public comments, as seen with M855 ammunition, are crucial for influencing ATF decisions.

Chapters

  1. 00:04No Standard Rate of Fire
  2. 00:10Bump Stock Legislation Focus
  3. 00:17Slippery Slope Argument
  4. 00:23Magazine Capacity Concerns
  5. 00:44Agency Authority to Ban Items
  6. 00:55GOA Website Alert
  7. 01:14History: M855 Ammunition Case
  8. 01:38Next Steps: Contacting Trump
  9. 01:47ATF's Previous Rulings
  10. 01:54Bump Stock Functionality
  11. 02:03Humorous Examples of Regulation

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main argument against regulating bump stocks based on rate of fire?

The primary argument is that there is no established 'standard rate of fire' for firearms, making legislation focused on devices that accelerate it arbitrary. Furthermore, regulating bump stocks could set a precedent for regulating other accessories like magazines, which also increase the rate of fire.

How can individuals influence ATF regulations on firearms?

Individuals can influence ATF regulations by submitting comments during public comment periods. Gun Owners of America highlights a past success where public comments led the Obama administration to back off from reclassifying M855 ammunition.

What is the significance of the M855 ammunition case mentioned in the video?

The M855 ammunition case serves as an example of how a large volume of public comments, generated by gun rights organizations, can successfully pressure federal agencies like the ATF to reverse proposed regulations.

What is the 'slippery slope' concern regarding bump stock regulation?

The 'slippery slope' concern is that if an agency like the ATF can unilaterally ban bump stocks based on their effect on the rate of fire, it could lead to the regulation and banning of other common firearm accessories, such as magazines, which also enhance firing speed.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Gun Owners of America

View all →