New York Comes Up With Its Dumbest Gun Law Yet...Again

This video from Guns & Gadgets analyzes New York's proposed Senate Bill S362 and Assembly Bill A3233, which would mandate a ten-day waiting period for all firearm purchases, even after a successful background check. The speaker argues this measure is political cover for 'access control' rather than genuine public safety, citing the FBI's NICS system as instantaneous. The analysis highlights potential conflicts with the Bruen decision and the impact on law-abiding citizens.

This video discusses a Second Circuit Court ruling that upholds New York's ammunition background check law. William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, analyzes the decision in New York State Firearms Association v. James, highlighting the reasoning behind the ruling that found no constitutional issues with the law. Kirk expresses frustration with the justifications provided and encourages viewers to educate themselves on the implications for their Second Amendment rights. The description also includes links to the ruling, a form for video ideas, a newsletter signup, contact information for Washington Gun Law, and links to their Rumble and Patreon pages.

This video discusses a potentially groundbreaking lawsuit in New York related to the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). A court has allowed a lawsuit to proceed, not against the firearm manufacturer itself, but against a company that produced a magazine plug. The video highlights that this legal workaround could have significant negative consequences for the entire gun manufacturing industry if this logic becomes widespread. It encourages viewers to educate themselves on the implications of this ruling and promotes legal protection services for self-defense.

William Kirk of Washington Gun Law discusses NRA v. Vullo, a significant Supreme Court case focusing on First Amendment rights rather than the Second Amendment. The case challenges New York's actions in pressuring financial institutions to sever ties with the NRA, arguing it constitutes tortious interference with business relationships. This video aims to educate viewers on the implications of this legal challenge, emphasizing the importance of understanding constitutional rights.

William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, details two significant legal victories challenging unconstitutional firearm restrictions in California and New York. These cases, Nguyen v. Bonta and Christian v. James, highlight the effectiveness of strategic litigation by organizations like the Firearms Policy Coalition in preserving Second Amendment rights. The discussion emphasizes the importance of persistent legal challenges to reach the Supreme Court and overturn restrictive laws.

This video features Washington Gun Law President William Kirk discussing the legal arguments against banning body armor, specifically in the context of the Hetter v. James case in the US District Court for the Western District of New York. Kirk explains why body armor bans are likely unconstitutional and encourages viewers to educate themselves on their Second Amendment rights. The description also promotes the Firearms Policy Coalition, Right to Bear legal protection services, and provides contact information for Washington Gun Law.

This guide, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, outlines tactical and legal considerations for drivers encountering mob situations. It emphasizes de-escalation, identifying escape routes, and understanding the legal thresholds for self-defense, particularly the distinction between property damage and threats to human life. Kirk, a legal instructor, stresses the importance of restraint and lawful action.

This video, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, explores the complex legal question of whether one can legally shoot back at police if they are unlawfully firing. Kirk emphasizes that while a legal right to self-defense against imminent threats of death or serious bodily harm exists, the decision to use lethal force, especially against law enforcement, involves significant tactical and legal considerations beyond mere legality. The discussion highlights foundational self-defense principles and specific legal doctrines like the Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground.

This video, featuring William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, details how sheriffs in Arkansas are pushing back against federal gun control measures, particularly the ATF's pistol brace rule. It highlights Arkansas Act 1012 and state code 21-1-904, which aim to prevent state and local officials from enforcing federal firearms regulations deemed unconstitutional infringements on Second Amendment rights. The Arkansas Sheriff's Association has officially stated their non-support for enforcing such rules, prioritizing focus on violent offenders.

William Kirk from Washington Gun Law clarifies that the ATF cannot demand inspection of non-NFA firearms without a warrant. While NFA ownership doesn't waive Fourth Amendment rights, FFLs are subject to annual inspections, a rule not applicable to private individuals. If ATF agents arrive without a warrant, consent is typically required, and politely declining is advised.