NRATV Live | Who Decides What's "Fake News?" - 12/16/16

This video appears to discuss media narratives surrounding alleged fraud, framed with a tone of skepticism and critique. While the title and description do not explicitly mention firearms, the context of "regulated industries" and the potential for nuanced discussions around industry practices could indirectly touch upon areas relevant to firearms owners or enthusiasts, particularly concerning information dissemination and public perception.

This NRATV video, titled 'Our Greatest Weapon is Truth,' asserts that truth is their primary tool to combat what they describe as the 'lying fake news media.' The content focuses on a rhetorical or ideological argument rather than demonstrating or discussing specific firearms, calibers, manufacturers, or gear.

This YouTube video announces the upcoming television debut of Dan Bongino's new show, "We Stand," on NRATV. The description highlights Bongino's identity as an NRA member rather than a traditional media member, emphasizing his intention to "take back the truth." The show is scheduled to air Monday through Friday at 4:30 p.m. CT/5:30 p.m. ET, starting March 5th.

This video features Dan Bongino appearing on NRATV, with the title and description suggesting a political commentary or discussion related to media narratives and the truth. The phrase "Lemon-aide" is a play on "lemonade," implying that something negative or critical is being served. The content seems to revolve around Bongino's perspective and his platform on NRATV, likely touching upon gun rights and media bias.

This video features Grant Stinchfield of NRATV confronting ABC News' Matthew Dowd, who is accused of spreading misinformation about the NRA and its members. Stinchfield refutes Dowd's claims by presenting what he terms 'real facts' about the NRA's founding principles, its role in defending Second Amendment rights, its membership size, and its influence on political outcomes such as the election of President Trump and the appointment of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court. The description also criticizes Dowd as a political opportunist and ABC News as a 'fake news network' that disseminates lies.

This video appears to be a commentary on how media narratives can be misleading and encourages viewers to avoid engaging with sensationalized or biased content. While the title and description do not explicitly mention firearms, the phrase 'walk away from the bait' and the general tone could be interpreted as advice applicable to situations where firearms-related topics are misrepresented by the media. The focus is on critical thinking and avoiding media manipulation.

This NRA News segment features Dom Raso, a U.S. Navy SEAL veteran, dissecting instances of public figures allegedly misrepresenting military experiences for personal gain. Raso contrasts fabricated or exaggerated claims, such as Hillary Clinton's Bosnia 'sniper fire' story, with the harsh realities of combat, emphasizing the importance of truthfulness and accountability for those seeking leadership positions. The video highlights the gravity of military service and the ethical implications of exploiting it for political advancement.

Armed citizens Jack Wilson and Stephen Willeford, who stopped mass shooters, critically analyze Joe Biden's proposed gun control measures. They highlight the ineffectiveness of 'shoot them in the leg' advice in real-world scenarios and defend the AR-15 platform against mischaracterizations. The discussion emphasizes the potential financial burden of proposed taxes and the criminalization of private gun transfers under 'universal background checks,' urging viewers to support the NRA.

This video emphasizes the NRA's mission to defend Second Amendment rights against perceived threats from 'elites' and gun control advocates. Speakers like Wayne LaPierre and Donald Trump Jr. highlight the importance of firearm ownership for personal safety and freedom. The NRA is presented as the primary organization fighting to preserve these rights for law-abiding citizens.

This video details the case of Austin Tong, a Fordham University student charged with a hate crime for posting a picture of an AR-15, citing self-defense needs due to rising crime and anti-Asian sentiment. The university's misidentification of the rifle as automatic and subsequent disciplinary actions are highlighted, with Tong arguing for his Second Amendment rights and planning legal action against the university for alleged free speech violations. The NRA and 'Students for 2A' are supporting his defense.