Oregon, Here's What You Need to Do to Stay Out of Jail

This video discusses a "brutal ruling" in Oregon that imposes a ban on untraceable and undetectable firearms, as well as unfinished frames and receivers. The ruling, in the case of Montgomery v. Rosenblum, challenges Oregon HB 2005, which is set to go into effect on September 1st. The motion for an injunction was denied, meaning Oregon residents have until September 1st to bring their firearms into compliance with the new law. The video urges viewers to "arm yourself with education" and provides resources for further information and to contact Washington Gun Law.

Oregon has enacted new gun laws, including SB 243, which bans rapid fire devices like binary triggers and bump stocks, effective September 26th. The state is also implementing pre-purchasing licensing requirements under Ballot Measure 114, with an activation date of March 15th, 2026. Violations for manufacturing or transporting banned items can result in a felony, while mere possession is a misdemeanor.

Oregon's Senate Bill 243, effective September 26, 2025, introduces significant restrictions on firearm accessories and public spaces. The law bans 'rapid fire activators,' including bump stocks and forced reset triggers, making their possession a misdemeanor and their transfer a felony. Additionally, it empowers local governments to designate buildings used for official meetings as gun-free zones, overriding concealed carry permits. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law TV emphasizes the critical need for Oregon residents to understand these changes to avoid criminal prosecution.

This video, presented by William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, details how Washington State's gun legislation often serves as a precursor to national gun control measures. Kirk highlights specific laws like universal background checks (Initiative 594, RCW 9.41.113) and red flag laws (RCW 7.94), as well as the regulation of 80% lowers and untraceable firearms (HB 1705). The presentation critiques the influence of Washington politicians like Governor Inslee and AG Ferguson on national policy.

This video recaps the public testimony on Washington State House Bill 1705 (HB 1705). William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, highlights key moments from the hearing. HB 1705, which has moved from the House to the Senate, proposes a ban on untraceable firearms and 80% lowers. The video features excerpts from witnesses who testified both for and against the bill, aiming to educate viewers on the proposed legislation and its potential impact.

This video provides an urgent update on two proposed Washington state firearm bills, HB 1705 and HB 1630, with public hearings scheduled for February 21, 2022. HB 1705 aims to ban untraceable firearms and 80% lowers, while HB 1630, despite its stated purpose of limiting firearms at school board meetings, is seen as an attempt to erode state preemption laws. The video encourages viewers to act and learn more about these bills, providing links to watch the hearing, comment on the legislation, and contact their legislators.

This guide, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, outlines tactical and legal considerations for drivers encountering mob situations. It emphasizes de-escalation, identifying escape routes, and understanding the legal thresholds for self-defense, particularly the distinction between property damage and threats to human life. Kirk, a legal instructor, stresses the importance of restraint and lawful action.

This video, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, explores the complex legal question of whether one can legally shoot back at police if they are unlawfully firing. Kirk emphasizes that while a legal right to self-defense against imminent threats of death or serious bodily harm exists, the decision to use lethal force, especially against law enforcement, involves significant tactical and legal considerations beyond mere legality. The discussion highlights foundational self-defense principles and specific legal doctrines like the Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground.

This video, featuring William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, details how sheriffs in Arkansas are pushing back against federal gun control measures, particularly the ATF's pistol brace rule. It highlights Arkansas Act 1012 and state code 21-1-904, which aim to prevent state and local officials from enforcing federal firearms regulations deemed unconstitutional infringements on Second Amendment rights. The Arkansas Sheriff's Association has officially stated their non-support for enforcing such rules, prioritizing focus on violent offenders.

William Kirk from Washington Gun Law clarifies that the ATF cannot demand inspection of non-NFA firearms without a warrant. While NFA ownership doesn't waive Fourth Amendment rights, FFLs are subject to annual inspections, a rule not applicable to private individuals. If ATF agents arrive without a warrant, consent is typically required, and politely declining is advised.