Rare Breed Triggers Loses 1st Court Battle w/ATF

Published on October 18, 2021
Duration: 4:53

This video details the legal challenges Rare Breed Triggers faces with the ATF regarding their forced reset trigger, which the ATF has classified as a machine gun. A US District Court judge denied Rare Breed's request for a preliminary injunction, allowing the ATF to potentially take action against the product while the main lawsuit proceeds. The speaker expresses strong criticism of the judge's reasoning and interpretation of legal principles.

Quick Summary

Rare Breed Triggers is suing the ATF after the agency classified their forced reset trigger as a machine gun. A US District Court judge denied Rare Breed's request for a preliminary injunction, allowing the ATF to potentially act against the product while the main lawsuit continues.

Chapters

  1. 00:04Lawsuit Initiation: Rare Breed vs. ATF
  2. 00:55Forced Reset Trigger Functionality & ATF Actions
  3. 01:43Preliminary Injunction Denied by Judge
  4. 02:02Judge's Controversial Financial Impact Ruling
  5. 02:32Judge's 'Guilty Until Proven Innocent' Stance
  6. 03:09Judge Questions Authority on Prosecutions
  7. 03:22ATF's Threat to Seize Products
  8. 03:41Lawsuit Continues, Judge Criticized
  9. 04:00Community Discussion & Product Experience

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main legal issue in the Rare Breed Triggers lawsuit against the ATF?

The core issue is the ATF's determination that Rare Breed Triggers' forced reset trigger constitutes an unlawful machine gun. Rare Breed argues their trigger requires a separate pull for each shot, not automatic firing, and is suing to continue sales.

Did Rare Breed Triggers win their request for a preliminary injunction?

No, US District Court Judge Carlos Mendoza denied Rare Breed Triggers' request for a preliminary injunction. This means the ATF can potentially take action against the product while the main lawsuit against the ATF proceeds.

What was the judge's reasoning for denying the preliminary injunction?

Judge Mendoza cited a perceived 'lack' of financial impact on Rare Breed Triggers or its leaders from ATF actions, including potential fines and prison time. This reasoning was strongly disagreed with by the video's speaker.

What is the ATF's stance on seizing Rare Breed Triggers products?

The ATF has stated they reserve the right to seize any Rare Breed Triggers products currently in existence. They plan to use company records from sales to identify and potentially confiscate these items.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News

View all →