Restraining Orders and Gun Rights: What’s Changing!?

Published on April 9, 2026
Duration: 13:57

This video from CRPA TV discusses Assembly Bill 1753 in California, which proposes expanding the scope of restraining orders to include the confiscation of ammunition in addition to firearms. Rick Travis, Legislative Director for CRPA, explains how this bill builds upon existing Gun Violence Restraining Orders (GVROs), arguing that such expansions lack demonstrated public safety benefits and can be abused, leading to the unconstitutional removal of firearms and ammunition from law-abiding citizens. The discussion also touches on the potential for illegal search and seizure issues related to the 'plain sight' discovery of firearms and ammunition.

Quick Summary

California's Assembly Bill 1753 proposes expanding restraining orders to include the confiscation of ammunition alongside firearms. Critics argue this measure lacks public safety benefits, potentially violates due process, and could lead to illegal search and seizure, disproportionately affecting law-abiding citizens.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to AB 1753
  2. 00:26CRPA TV Channel Overview
  3. 00:53Assembly Bill 1753 Details
  4. 01:49Bill Text: Firearm and Ammunition Relinquishment
  5. 02:22Context of Restraining Orders and GVROs
  6. 03:02History of Restraining Orders vs. GVROs
  7. 03:38Abuse of GVROs and Due Process Concerns
  8. 04:02Examples of GVRO Misuse
  9. 04:51Lack of Public Safety Benefit
  10. 08:11Critique of Ammunition Expansion
  11. 09:10Further Clarification: Search and Seizure
  12. 09:15Bill Text: Peace Officer Duties
  13. 09:35Ammunition Custody by Peace Officers
  14. 09:44State-Mandated Local Program Impact
  15. 10:07Legal Challenges: Search and Seizure Issues
  16. 11:13Consensual vs. Non-Consensual Searches
  17. 11:28Impact of State-Mandated Program on Bill's Chances
  18. 11:48Financial and Political Considerations
  19. 12:12CRPA's Advocacy and Call to Action
  20. 13:00Disproportionate Impact on Firearm Owners
  21. 13:10Delays in Firearm/Ammunition Return
  22. 13:31Call to Subscribe and Advocate

Frequently Asked Questions

What is California Assembly Bill 1753 proposing regarding restraining orders?

California Assembly Bill 1753 aims to expand the scope of restraining orders by explicitly requiring individuals subject to them to relinquish not only firearms but also any ammunition in their immediate possession or control. This bill also extends existing search and record-keeping requirements to various civil harassment and abuse restraining orders.

What are the main criticisms of California's AB 1753 and similar Gun Violence Restraining Orders (GVROs)?

Critics argue that AB 1753 and GVROs lack demonstrated public safety benefits, can be abused to weaponize disputes, and violate due process by presuming guilt. They also highlight the potential for illegal search and seizure and the disproportionate impact on law-abiding firearm owners.

How does AB 1753 affect the confiscation of ammunition?

AB 1753 specifically mandates that peace officers must take temporary custody of any ammunition found in plain sight or discovered during a lawful search when enforcing certain restraining orders. This is a new expansion beyond just firearms.

What are the concerns about search and seizure related to AB 1753?

There are significant concerns that the 'in plain sight' clause and the broad interpretation of 'lawful search' could lead to overreach and illegal search and seizure of firearms and ammunition, particularly in high-stress situations where individuals might feel intimidated into consenting to searches.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from CRPA TV

View all →