Seattle Sued Over Helping CHOP/CHAZ To Exist

Published on October 19, 2020
Duration: 8:10

This video discusses a federal lawsuit filed by 21 businesses against the city of Seattle. The lawsuit alleges that the city's actions, including providing support and adopting a 'no response' policy, contributed to the existence and negative impacts of the Capitol Hill Organized Protest (CHOP) and Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone (CHAZ). A federal judge allowed three of the four claims to proceed, finding that the city's actions plausibly placed businesses in a worse position.

Quick Summary

A federal judge has allowed a lawsuit filed by 21 businesses against the city of Seattle to proceed. The businesses allege that Seattle's support for the CHOP/CHAZ, including providing supplies and adopting a 'no response' policy, led to property damage, restricted business operations, and a failure to protect them from dangers created by the city's own actions.

Chapters

  1. 00:03Intro: Seattle's CHOP/CHAZ
  2. 00:16Sponsor: Blackout Coffee
  3. 01:00Background: CHOP/CHAZ Formation
  4. 02:37Lawsuit Against Seattle Allowed
  5. 03:02Allegations of City Support
  6. 03:55No Response Policy Claim
  7. 04:09Judge's Decision Details
  8. 05:06Dismissed vs. Allowed Claims
  9. 05:33Details of Allowed Claims
  10. 05:56Accountability for CHOP/CHAZ Outcomes
  11. 06:31Call to Action & Outro

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the lawsuit against Seattle regarding the CHOP/CHAZ about?

The lawsuit, filed by 21 businesses, alleges that the city of Seattle's actions, including providing material support and implementing a 'no response' policy, contributed to the existence and negative impacts of the CHOP/CHAZ. Businesses claim their property was damaged, their use restricted, and they were not protected from dangers created by the city's own policies during the occupation.

Did the federal judge dismiss the lawsuit against Seattle?

No, a federal judge allowed three of the four legal claims in the lawsuit against Seattle to proceed. While one claim regarding equal protection was dismissed, the judge found that the businesses had plausibly alleged that the city's actions foreseeably placed them in a worse position.

What kind of support did Seattle allegedly provide to the CHOP/CHAZ?

The lawsuit alleges that Seattle provided material support to the CHOP/CHAZ protesters, including concrete barriers, medical supplies, sanitation facilities, portable toilets, and lighting. The city also allegedly instructed police to adopt a 'no response' policy for non-life-threatening issues.

What are the main claims in the lawsuit against Seattle that were allowed to proceed?

The three allowed claims allege that the city unlawfully took private property for public use without compensation, restricted businesses' ability to fully use their property for business operations, and failed to protect businesses from dangers that arose from the city's own actions during the CHOP/CHAZ occupation.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Guns & Gadgets 2nd Amendment News

View all →