The 11% Gun Tax Lawsuit Got a Surprising Ruling

This video discusses new gun control legislation in California, specifically Assembly Bill 28 (AB 28), which proposes an 11% excise tax on firearms, ammunition, and parts. The host argues this tax, disguised within Proposition 30, unfairly targets legal gun owners, potentially making firearms unaffordable and infringing on Second Amendment rights. The video highlights California's history of restrictive gun laws and suggests potential legal challenges based on Supreme Court precedent like the Bruen decision. Viewers are encouraged to contact their representatives to oppose AB 28.

This video discusses the James V. Maduros lawsuit challenging California's AB 28, an 11% excise tax on firearms and ammunition. The legal team explains the procedural complexities of tax litigation, including why the case was filed in state court due to federal anti-tax injunction laws and the necessity of exhausting administrative remedies. They highlight the challenges posed by the 'sovereign right' doctrine in tax cases and the strategic decision to include FFLs as plaintiffs to establish standing. The discussion also touches on the difficulty of challenging such taxes compared to clearer constitutional violations and the potential for delays within the administrative process.

William Kirk of Washington Gun Law critically analyzes California's AB 28, a proposed excise tax on firearms and ammunition. He argues it functions as a 'Second Amendment tax' and a form of civilian disarmament, drawing parallels to historical poll taxes. Kirk urges Governor Newsom to veto the bill on constitutional grounds, citing precedent like Harper v. Virginia.

This video provides an expert legal analysis of a lawsuit challenging California's AB 28, an 11% tax on firearms and ammunition. The speaker, an expert in firearms law, details the legal standing requirements, the reasons for filing in state court due to the Tax Anti-Injunction Act, and the core arguments that the tax violates the Second Amendment by singling out protected rights for taxation without historical analogues, citing key Supreme Court precedents. Support for the involved organizations is encouraged.

The CRPA has filed a lawsuit challenging California's AB 28, which imposes an 11% excise tax on firearms and ammunition. The lawsuit argues this tax is designed to frustrate the market and is not a related cause for funding general crime fighting. The CRPA is partnering with the Second Amendment Foundation and FPC, and gun stores are also involved as plaintiffs due to their direct financial impact.

This video discusses several new and upcoming California gun laws in 2024, including SB 1384 requiring 24-hour surveillance for FFLs, SB 2 restricting CCW permits in 'sensitive places' and mandating signage, and AB 28 imposing an 11% excise tax on firearms and ammunition. The speakers, Rick Travis (CRPA Legislative Director) and Kevin, express strong opposition to these laws, arguing they infringe upon constitutional rights, disproportionately affect small businesses and law-abiding citizens, and are based on false pretenses. They highlight ongoing litigation and the political motivations behind these legislative actions.

This video discusses the Supreme Court's decision to overturn the Chevron Doctrine, which previously granted deference to federal agencies' interpretations of statutes. CRPA President Chuck Michelle explains how this impacts agencies like the ATF, potentially limiting their ability to enact regulations without clear statutory authority. The discussion also covers recent SCOTUS decisions on Second Amendment cases, including the denial of cert in Illinois gun ban cases and the GVR (Grant, Vacate, Remand) of cases in light of the Rahimi decision, signaling a shift in how gun rights litigation may proceed.

This video discusses President Trump's executive order aimed at reviewing and potentially reversing actions that may infringe upon Second Amendment rights. Rick Travis, CRPA Legislative Director, breaks down the order's implications, focusing on the Attorney General's role in examining regulations, particularly those concerning 'ghost guns' (DIY firearm kits) and age restrictions. The discussion also touches upon the potential impact of the order on existing Second Amendment lawsuits and the role of state governments in challenging federal actions.

This video provides an expert overview of key California firearm laws and regulations taking effect in 2025 and beyond, presented by attorney Matt Cabero. It details changes to firearm storage requirements, the impact of the ammunition tax, and updates to CCW permit processes. The discussion highlights the efforts of organizations like CRPA in shaping legislation and regulatory outcomes.

This video discusses two lawsuits challenging California laws that prohibit firearm, ammunition, and precursor part sales on state-owned properties, specifically targeting gun shows at the Del Mar Fairgrounds and OC Fair and Event Center. The discussion highlights the legal arguments presented at the Ninth Circuit, including First and Second Amendment claims, and the differing outcomes in the lower courts. It also touches upon the perceived bias of the judicial panel and the strategic considerations in arguing such cases.