The Governor Who's Just Getting Started.

Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, analyzes two bills, SB 5819 and HB 1386, to expose the hypocrisy of the Washington State Legislature and its ongoing efforts against Second Amendment rights. The video aims to educate viewers on legislative actions and their implications for gun owners in Washington state. It encourages viewers to arm themselves with knowledge and stay informed about their rights.

This video, hosted by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, analyzes an Amicus Brief filed in the Wolford v. Lopez Supreme Court case. The brief, submitted by the New Jersey Association of Rifle and Pistol Clubs, aims to illustrate the detrimental effects of unchecked civilian disarmament laws. Kirk delves into the brief to provide viewers with a perspective on living under extreme gun control, encouraging viewers to educate themselves on these issues. The description also provides links to the brief, resources for submitting video ideas, newsletter subscriptions, and contact information for Washington Gun Law.

This video analyzes a new city ordinance in St. Paul, Minnesota, that prohibits firearms. The speaker, William Kirk from Washington Gun Law, argues that this ordinance is likely unconstitutional due to state preemption laws, which prevent local governments from enacting firearm regulations that conflict with state law. Kirk explains the implications of these preemption laws and asserts that the St. Paul ordinance is essentially invalid, advising citizens in St. Paul and elsewhere not to be concerned about its enforceability. The video aims to educate viewers about their Second Amendment rights and the legal landscape of firearm regulations.

This video analyzes a legal brief from Cook County, Illinois, supporting civilian disarmament and challenging an assault weapon ban. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law critiques the brief's tone, messaging, and detachment from reality, arguing it's one of the most "nasty" documents written in favor of gun control. The content encourages viewers to educate themselves on these issues and provides links to the brief, a newsletter, and contact information for legal advice regarding Second Amendment rights.

This video discusses the critical legal battle in Oregon concerning Ballot Measure 114, which is currently before the State Supreme Court in the case of Arnold v. Kotek. William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, explains the stakes involved and argues that requiring government permission to exercise a fundamental right negates its very nature. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on the issue and provides a link to listen to the oral arguments live, as well as resources for subscribing to their newsletter and contacting Washington Gun Law for further information. It highlights this as Oregon's final opportunity to protect its constitutional rights.

This video discusses the case of Kyle Culotta, a new resident of Massachusetts, who has been incarcerated for nearly four months due to possessing firearms and magazines that are legal in most other states. The presenter, William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, highlights how overly strict civilian disarmament laws can inadvertently ensnare responsible gun owners. The video encourages viewers to learn more and support Kyle through the provided GOAL.org link, emphasizing the importance of education and awareness regarding firearm laws.

This guide, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, outlines tactical and legal considerations for drivers encountering mob situations. It emphasizes de-escalation, identifying escape routes, and understanding the legal thresholds for self-defense, particularly the distinction between property damage and threats to human life. Kirk, a legal instructor, stresses the importance of restraint and lawful action.

This video, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, explores the complex legal question of whether one can legally shoot back at police if they are unlawfully firing. Kirk emphasizes that while a legal right to self-defense against imminent threats of death or serious bodily harm exists, the decision to use lethal force, especially against law enforcement, involves significant tactical and legal considerations beyond mere legality. The discussion highlights foundational self-defense principles and specific legal doctrines like the Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground.

This video, featuring William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, details how sheriffs in Arkansas are pushing back against federal gun control measures, particularly the ATF's pistol brace rule. It highlights Arkansas Act 1012 and state code 21-1-904, which aim to prevent state and local officials from enforcing federal firearms regulations deemed unconstitutional infringements on Second Amendment rights. The Arkansas Sheriff's Association has officially stated their non-support for enforcing such rules, prioritizing focus on violent offenders.

William Kirk from Washington Gun Law clarifies that the ATF cannot demand inspection of non-NFA firearms without a warrant. While NFA ownership doesn't waive Fourth Amendment rights, FFLs are subject to annual inspections, a rule not applicable to private individuals. If ATF agents arrive without a warrant, consent is typically required, and politely declining is advised.