The Horrendous Failure of Gun Control

Published on January 20, 2015
Duration: 17:11

This video features Eric Pratt of Gun Owners of America discussing the perceived failures of gun control, particularly in France, and advocating for the right to self-defense. Pratt argues that strict gun laws disarm law-abiding citizens, making them vulnerable to criminals and terrorists. He highlights instances where armed citizens have stopped mass shootings and criticizes the concept of "gun-free zones" as ineffective. The discussion also touches on the historical context of gun legislation and proposed bills related to mental health and firearms.

Quick Summary

Eric Pratt of Gun Owners of America argues that strict gun control laws, like those in France, fail to prevent terrorism and create vulnerable 'soft targets' in gun-free zones. He asserts that the 'assault weapon' ban was a fabricated term that proved ineffective, and that the right to self-defense is paramount.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction & Guest
  2. 01:16The Failure of Gun Control in France
  3. 01:57Gun-Free Zones as Soft Targets
  4. 02:15Citizen Self-Defense Examples
  5. 02:41Hypocrisy in Security Measures
  6. 03:31Liam Neeson's Stance on Guns
  7. 04:14French Police Response to Terrorists
  8. 04:50French Gun Law Details
  9. 06:30The Fabrication of 'Assault Weapons'
  10. 07:37Post-Assault Weapons Ban Safety
  11. 08:02FBI Background Check Trends
  12. 09:30Gun Owners of America & Breitbart
  13. 13:38Gun Rights Advocacy & Compromise
  14. 14:11Presidential Disappointment on Gun Control
  15. 14:46Focus on Mental Health & Firearms
  16. 15:02Proposed Legislation (HR 3199, HR 602)
  17. 15:25Bumper Sticker Idea
  18. 16:14International Shootings & Terrorism
  19. 16:44Outlaws and Guns Quote
  20. 17:03Conclusion & Website

Frequently Asked Questions

How effective are gun control laws in preventing terrorism?

According to Eric Pratt of Gun Owners of America, even stringent gun control measures, such as those in France, have proven ineffective in preventing determined terrorists from acquiring firearms illegally. He argues that such laws disarm law-abiding citizens, leaving them vulnerable rather than protected.

What is the argument against gun-free zones?

The primary argument against gun-free zones, as presented by Eric Pratt, is that they create 'soft targets' by disarming law-abiding citizens. This makes individuals in these zones unable to defend themselves during an attack, effectively turning them into victims rather than allowing for self-defense.

Was the 'assault weapon' ban effective?

Eric Pratt contends that the 'assault weapon' ban was a fabrication and ineffective. He notes that the US has a lower murder rate today than in 2004 when the ban expired, suggesting that the availability of these firearms to law-abiding citizens has not increased violence.

What is Gun Owners of America's stance on gun rights?

Gun Owners of America (GOA) is a non-profit lobbying organization that strongly advocates for Second Amendment rights. They oppose most forms of gun control, arguing that it infringes on the rights of law-abiding citizens and does not deter criminals or terrorists.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Gun Owners of America

View all →