This Week in Guns: Feb 21 2021 - Universal Background Checks, SCOTUS, Smart Guns, and more.

Published on February 22, 2021
Duration: 65:50

This episode of 'This Week in Guns' discusses several key firearms-related legal and regulatory topics. It covers the push for universal background checks, the implications of Supreme Court cases like Gruel v. Defense Distributed and Hayward v. Stoddard Nunez concerning jurisdiction and qualified immunity, and the debate around pistol braces and smart gun technology. The hosts also touch on sheriff enforcement of gun laws and a case of a 12-year-old successfully defending his home.

Quick Summary

Universal background checks are criticized for being non-preventative, often leading to add-on charges for existing crimes rather than stopping new ones. They primarily create annoyance for law-abiding gun owners by adding complexity to private transfers, rather than deterring criminals.

Chapters

  1. 00:07Intro & Weather Chat
  2. 02:22Universal Background Checks Push
  3. 03:09Colorado's Universal Background Checks Experience
  4. 04:09FFL Perspective on Transfers
  5. 06:42Criminals & Law Abiding Citizens
  6. 08:37Boulder-Made Firearms History
  7. 10:38Supreme Court Cases Overview
  8. 10:51Gruel v. Defense Distributed Explained
  9. 13:33Polymer 80 Lawsuit & Jurisdiction
  10. 18:13Hayward v. Stoddard Nunez & Deadly Force
  11. 19:14Qualified Immunity Explained
  12. 23:45Listener Email on Use of Force Law
  13. 31:27Sheriff Opposition to Gun Control
  14. 33:36Enforcement Challenges: Sheriffs vs. Police Chiefs
  15. 37:05Financial Deterrents for Law Enforcement Misconduct
  16. 40:5112-Year-Old Defends Home with Firearm
  17. 46:42SafeUp Smart Gun System Review
  18. 53:00Pistol Brace Regulation Concerns
  19. 59:06Porch Pirate Confrontation
  20. 64:12Patriot Patch Company Plug
  21. 65:28Outro & Final Thoughts

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main concern regarding universal background checks?

Critics argue that universal background checks, like those in Colorado, are often non-preventative. They tend to result in add-on charges for existing crimes rather than stopping new ones, and primarily create annoyance for law-abiding gun owners by adding complexity to private transfers.

What legal principle is being debated in Gruel v. Defense Distributed?

The Supreme Court case Gruel v. Defense Distributed examines federal court jurisdiction. The core question is whether a state's Attorney General can exert legal authority over a company in another state, particularly when the company hasn't directly availed itself of that state's protections.

How does qualified immunity affect police misconduct lawsuits?

Qualified immunity shields government officials, including police officers, from civil lawsuits unless their conduct violates clearly established constitutional rights. This doctrine often prevents cases from going to trial, even if the officer's actions were questionable, by arguing they couldn't have known their specific actions were unlawful.

What are the potential security risks of smart gun technology?

Smart gun technology, especially systems using Bluetooth like SafeUp, faces security concerns. Bluetooth is known to be hackable, raising fears that malicious actors could disable firearms remotely, compromising self-defense capabilities. The reliability of battery-powered systems in critical situations is also questioned.

Why are pistol brace regulations controversial?

Pistol brace regulations are controversial because their classification is often based on obscure legal definitions and historical legislative oversights. Critics argue that the ATF uses these 'gray areas' to potentially ban items like pistol braces, which many owners view as essential for firearm stability and control.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Fudd Busters

View all →