United Nations Says Internet Access is a Human Right - What About Self Defense?

Published on June 11, 2011
Duration: 10:51

This video discusses the United Nations' stance on internet access as a human right versus their approach to self-defense rights, particularly concerning the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT). Tom Mason of the World Forum on the Future of Sports Shooting Activities argues that the UN's prioritization of internet access over the ancient right to self-defense is indicative of a broader distrust among Americans. The discussion highlights concerns that the ATT, initially intended for military arms, is being co-opted by anti-gun groups to pursue international gun control, potentially impacting civilian firearm ownership through measures like international gun registries and bans on semi-automatic firearms. The NRA's role in opposing these measures is emphasized, with upcoming meetings at the UN to advocate for the exemption of civilian firearms from the ATT.

Quick Summary

The United Nations has declared internet access a human right, while previously stating self-defense is not a human right. This stance, coupled with concerns that the Arms Trade Treaty could be used for international gun control, is a major point of discussion for firearm rights advocates like the NRA.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction & UN Internet Right
  2. 00:36Self-Defense vs. Internet Access
  3. 01:44Ancient Right to Self-Defense
  4. 02:30Arms Trade Treaty Concerns
  5. 03:00Memo to Cranks Article
  6. 04:09ATT & Semi-Automatic Firearms
  7. 04:41International Gun Registry Fears
  8. 05:31Exemption for Civilian Firearms
  9. 06:06ATT's Original Intent
  10. 06:46Hijacking the ATT
  11. 07:02NRA's Resistance
  12. 07:22ATT Hijacked by Anti-Gun Movement
  13. 08:24International Opposition to ATT
  14. 08:50Excluding Civilian Firearms
  15. 09:13Global Civilian Firearm Ownership
  16. 10:13Upcoming UN Meeting

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the UN's stance on internet access versus self-defense rights?

The UN has declared internet access a human right, while previously stating that self-defense is not a human right. This prioritization is seen by some as a disconnect from fundamental rights recognized in countries like the United States, where self-defense is considered an ancient and inherent right.

How might the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) affect civilian gun owners?

Concerns exist that the ATT, initially intended for military arms, could be used by anti-gun groups to implement international gun control. This includes potential bans on semi-automatic firearms and the establishment of international gun registries through lifecycle tracking of firearms.

What is the role of the NRA in the Arms Trade Treaty discussions?

The NRA is actively participating in UN meetings to advocate for the unequivocal exemption of civilian firearms from the Arms Trade Treaty. They are recognized as a strong voice opposing measures that could impact lawful gun ownership in the United States.

What percentage of firearms globally are legally owned by civilians?

Globally, an estimated 60-70% of all firearms are legally owned by civilians. Of these, approximately 60% are located in the United States, underscoring the significant presence of civilian firearm ownership in the US.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from NRA

View all →