Update on CRPA Lawsuit Challenging CA’s Handgun “Roster”

Published on August 9, 2022
Duration: 11:05

This video provides an update on the CRPA lawsuit challenging California's handgun "roster" law, Bolen v. Banta, in the wake of the Bruin decision. Chuck Michel, President of CRPA, explains how the roster law limits consumer choice and prevents modern handguns from being sold in California, citing microstamping as a key barrier. The discussion also covers the legal strategy of seeking injunctive relief and the impact of the Bruin decision on other related cases like Duncan v. Basara.

Quick Summary

The CRPA lawsuit Bolen v. Banta challenges California's handgun "roster" law, arguing it limits consumer choice by preventing 80-90% of handguns sold nationwide from being available in the state. A key barrier is the microstamping requirement for new handguns, which manufacturers refuse to implement, effectively freezing the roster.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction and Update on Litigation
  2. 00:38CRPA Lawsuit: Bolen v. Banta & Handgun Roster Challenge
  3. 01:07Impact of the Handgun Roster on Consumer Choice
  4. 02:42Microstamping Mandate and New Handgun Restrictions
  5. 03:21Post-Bruin Legal Strategy and Judicial Tactics
  6. 04:02Gavin Newsom's Agenda and Constitutional Challenges
  7. 05:01Prospects for Injunctive Relief and Quicker Results
  8. 06:46Duncan v. Basara and Ninth Circuit Briefings
  9. 07:35Impact of Bruin on Other Cases (Rohde, Flanagan, Rupp)
  10. 09:03Remand and Re-briefing of Cases Post-Bruin
  11. 10:04Conclusion and Staying Plugged In

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the CRPA lawsuit Bolen v. Banta challenging in California?

The CRPA lawsuit Bolen v. Banta is challenging California's handgun "roster" law. This law significantly restricts the types of handguns that can be legally sold to consumers within the state, limiting choices available to gun owners.

How does California's handgun roster law impact consumer choice?

California's handgun roster law has eliminated 80-90% of handguns sold nationwide from being available for purchase in the state. This severely limits consumer choice, preventing individuals from acquiring firearms suitable for their specific needs and circumstances.

What role does microstamping play in the handgun roster issue?

Microstamping is a mandated technology for new handguns to be added to California's roster. Since manufacturers are unwilling to implement this technology, it effectively prevents any new handgun models from becoming legal for sale in the state, keeping the roster stagnant.

What is the legal strategy regarding the Bruin decision and California gun laws?

Following the Bruin decision, the legal strategy involves seeking injunctive relief early in lawsuits to expedite the process. Cases are being re-argued and re-briefed in light of Bruin, aiming to strike down restrictive laws like the handgun roster and magazine bans.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from CRPA TV

View all →