WE BEAT NEWSOM! MAY V BONTA - CRPA WIN

Published on December 21, 2023
Duration: 5:43

This video announces a significant legal victory for gun rights advocates in California, specifically challenging SB2's 'sensitive spaces' and 'vampire clause' provisions. The ruling, issued by Judge Carney, restrains the enforcement of specific sections of the California Penal Code against CCW permit holders, lifting bans on carrying in previously restricted locations like parks, hospitals, and businesses. The speaker emphasizes the importance of supporting organizations like CRPA and FPC in these ongoing legal battles.

Quick Summary

A significant legal victory was achieved in the May v Bon and Cerero v Bon lawsuits, challenging California's SB2 'sensitive spaces' and 'vampire clause'. Judge Carney's ruling restrains enforcement of specific Penal Code sections against CCW permit holders, lifting bans on carrying in previously restricted locations like parks, hospitals, and businesses.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Legal Victory Announcement: May v Bon & SB2 Challenge
  2. 00:34Understanding Sensitive Spaces & Vampire Clause
  3. 01:22Judge Carney's Role and Legal Precedents
  4. 01:39Impact of Boland v. Bon Ruling
  5. 02:00CRPA, Saf Go, and Sensitive Spaces Lawsuits
  6. 02:23Limited Scope of the Sensitive Spaces Challenge
  7. 02:49Examples of Previously Banned Sensitive Spaces
  8. 04:05Details of the Court Order and Penal Code Sections
  9. 04:46Parking Area Ban Lifted by Injunction
  10. 05:25Conclusion and How to Support Future Efforts

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the outcome of the May v Bon lawsuit regarding California's SB2 law?

The May v Bon lawsuit, along with Cerero v Bon and supported by FPC and CRPA, resulted in a legal victory challenging California's SB2. Judge Carney issued a favorable ruling that restrains the enforcement of specific 'sensitive spaces' and the 'vampire clause' against CCW permit holders.

What are 'sensitive spaces' and the 'vampire clause' in California's SB2 law?

'Sensitive spaces' are locations where firearm carry is prohibited. The 'vampire clause' was a provision that would have made carrying in private buildings unlawful by default unless a sign permitted it, effectively reversing the burden for CCW holders.

Which previously banned locations are now permissible for CCW holders due to the May v Bon ruling?

Following the ruling, CCW permit holders are no longer banned from carrying in locations such as parks, hospitals, businesses, public gatherings, casinos, lottery ticket sales locations, and restaurants, which were previously restricted under SB2.

What specific California Penal Code sections were affected by the court order in the May v Bon case?

The court order restrains the enforcement of California Penal Code sections 26230 a 78-9, 10-13, 15-17, 19-20, 22-23, and 26 against CCW permit holders. It also specifically lifts the ban on carrying in parking areas.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Reno May

View all →