We Force the California Government to PAY $$$

Published on June 16, 2023
Duration: 13:22

This video details the successful lawsuit filed by CRPA TV against California's SB 1327, a law that made challengers of unconstitutional gun laws liable for government attorney's fees. The court ruled the law unconstitutional, leading to a settlement where CRPA will receive over $250,000 in attorney's fees, which will be reinvested into challenging further gun laws. The discussion highlights the detrimental impact such laws have on Second Amendment advocacy and the increasing trend of local ordinances circumventing state preemption.

Quick Summary

California's SB 1327, which made challengers of gun laws liable for government attorney's fees, was ruled unconstitutional in South Bay Rod and Gun Club v. Banta. This victory resulted in a settlement of nearly $600,000 in attorney's fees for advocates, which will be reinvested into challenging further restrictive firearms legislation.

Chapters

  1. 00:09Introduction and Channel Goals
  2. 00:18Guest Introduction: Josh Dale
  3. 00:21Lawsuit Overview: South Bay Rod and Gun Club v. Banta
  4. 00:34Subscriber Goal and Giveaway
  5. 01:21Details of SB 1327 (Bounty Law)
  6. 02:04Judge Benitez Ruling on SB 1327
  7. 02:17Settlement and Attorney's Fees
  8. 02:44Taxpayer Money Recouped
  9. 03:00Comparison to Texas Abortion Law
  10. 03:17Prevailing Party in Lawsuits
  11. 03:35Attorney's Fees in Civil Rights Challenges
  12. 04:01Public Policy of Encouraging Civil Rights Adjudication
  13. 04:47Impact of SB 1327 on Lawsuit Outcomes
  14. 05:12Recouping Tax Money for Advocacy
  15. 06:05Local Level Advocacy and Ordinances
  16. 06:22Post-Bruin Legislative and Local Actions
  17. 06:41Local Ordinances as a New Battlefront
  18. 07:33End of State Preemption for Gun Laws
  19. 08:11Challenges for Firearm Travelers
  20. 08:21Example: Firearm Theft Reporting Laws
  21. 09:03Trap for the Unwary
  22. 09:20Current Local Law Challenges (Glendale, San Francisco)
  23. 09:49Importance of Legal Victories
  24. 10:05Analogy: Cutting Heads Off a Hydra
  25. 10:13Continued Fight Against Local Ordinances
  26. 10:22Impact of SB 1327 if Not Struck Down
  27. 10:35Ending All Gun Law Challenges in CA
  28. 11:04Governor's Pivot and Tax Dollar Waste
  29. 11:45Glad to Get Money Back for Substantive Fights
  30. 11:56Focus on Local Jurisdictions
  31. 12:16Importance of Reporting and CRPA Chapters
  32. 12:31Call to Action for Advocacy
  33. 12:50Concluding Remarks and Thanks
  34. 13:01Final Call to Like, Share, and Subscribe

Frequently Asked Questions

What was SB 1327 in California?

SB 1327 was a California law that made individuals or organizations challenging unconstitutional gun laws responsible for paying the attorney's fees of the government entity they were suing. It was intended to deter legal challenges to gun control measures.

What was the outcome of the South Bay Rod and Gun Club v. Banta lawsuit?

The lawsuit successfully challenged SB 1327, with Judge Benitez ruling the law unconstitutional. As a result, CRPA and a co-party will receive a settlement totaling nearly $600,000 in attorney's fees, which will be reinvested into Second Amendment advocacy.

How does the ruling on SB 1327 benefit Second Amendment advocates?

By striking down SB 1327, the ruling removes a significant financial deterrent for organizations and individuals seeking to challenge unconstitutional gun laws. The recovered attorney's fees also provide crucial funding for future legal battles against restrictive firearms legislation.

What is the trend in California gun control following the Bruin decision?

Following the Bruin decision, gun control advocates are increasingly focusing on enacting local ordinances rather than statewide legislation. This strategy aims to create a patchwork of varying gun laws across different jurisdictions, making compliance difficult for firearm owners and circumventing state preemption.

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from CRPA TV

View all →