Videos tagged with California Attorney General

The Attorney General of California is proposing a 400% increase in background check fees for ammunition, raising it from $1 to $5 per transaction. This change is part of ongoing gun control measures in the state. A comment period is open until October 8th, allowing the public to voice opinions on the proposed fee increase, which critics argue is designed to price people out of firearm ownership and is potentially unconstitutional.

This video discusses Florida's age-based restrictions on firearm purchases, specifically the prohibition for individuals under 21. It highlights that California's Attorney General is supporting Florida in upholding this law through an amicus brief filed with the 11th Circuit Court. The speaker argues that such restrictions infringe upon fundamental rights, especially for individuals who can participate in other aspects of society like voting or military service.

This video discusses statements made by Kamala Harris regarding the use of gun owner lists and law enforcement to confiscate firearms. The speaker highlights her past actions as California's Attorney General, where she reportedly combined lists of individuals deemed a danger or prohibited from owning guns to send law enforcement to their homes to seize firearms. The content emphasizes the potential implications of such actions for Second Amendment rights.

This video details the successful lawsuit filed by CRPA TV against California's SB 1327, a law that made challengers of unconstitutional gun laws liable for government attorney's fees. The court ruled the law unconstitutional, leading to a settlement where CRPA will receive over $250,000 in attorney's fees, which will be reinvested into challenging further gun laws. The discussion highlights the detrimental impact such laws have on Second Amendment advocacy and the increasing trend of local ordinances circumventing state preemption.

The state of California is attempting to delay the 'Duncan v. Bonta' large capacity magazine ban case by requesting Judge Benitez to push the resolution date to March of next year. This follows Judge Benitez's order for both parties to submit supplemental briefs addressing the impact of the Bruin decision. California's filings, including an ex parte motion, aim to expedite the review of their request for an extension, arguing it's necessary to develop arguments consistent with the Bruin standard.

This video discusses the implications of credit card companies, under pressure from anti-gun organizations and politicians like California Attorney General Rob Bonta, creating special merchant codes for firearm and ammunition purchases. The speakers argue this is a tactic to track gun owners, not to prevent crime, as criminals do not typically use credit cards for illegal purchases. They express concern that this data could be used for future confiscation or to harass law-abiding citizens, drawing parallels to government overreach seen during the COVID-19 pandemic.

This video features Chuck Michel, President of CRPA, discussing the California DOJ data breach that leaked personal information of CCW holders. He clarifies that individuals should have received a letter if their data was compromised and outlines the limited options for recourse. Michel details the differences between class action, mass action, and individual lawsuits, emphasizing the complexities of privacy law and the potential for emotional distress damages. He also discusses efforts by CRPA to push for audits and independent investigations into the breach.

Chuck Michel, CRPA President, discusses the California DOJ data breach, where personal information of CCW holders was leaked. He clarifies that individuals should have received a letter from the AG's office if their data was compromised. Michel outlines potential legal recourse, including class action lawsuits, mass actions, and individual lawsuits against the DOJ, emphasizing the privacy implications and emotional distress caused by the leak.

This video discusses two critical legal issues for California firearm owners: a data breach by the California Attorney General's office exposing CCW applicant information and potential harassment by LAPD and LA County Sheriff's Department for possession of standard capacity magazines. The speaker highlights the implications of accepting a DOJ settlement offer, which waives the right to sue, and details the ongoing legal battles surrounding magazine bans, referencing key court cases like Duncan v. Bonta and the Bruin decision.

This video discusses a significant data breach by the California Department of Justice, where personal information of gun owners, including those with concealed carry permits, was publicly exposed. The incident occurred shortly after a court ruling invalidated certain gun laws, raising concerns about government competence or malfeasance and the risks associated with centralized gun registries.

This video features Rick Travis from the California Rifle and Pistol Association (CRPA) providing an update on the Duncan vs. Becerra case concerning California's magazine restrictions. The discussion centers on the case's current status with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and the California attorney general's request for an en banc review. The video also includes links for joining CRPA, shopping at Brownells, visiting the host's website, and checking out training at Practical Defense Systems, as well as support options like Patreon and donations.

This video discusses California's Red Flag laws, also known as Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) or Gun Violence Restraining Orders. It highlights how these laws allow for the temporary removal of firearms from individuals without due process, often based on the petition of law enforcement, employers, or even co-workers. The video criticizes the extension of these orders, particularly the 90-day addition due to the COVID-19 pandemic, arguing it further erodes constitutional rights by extending the period an individual can be disarmed without a conviction.