We Now Know WHY The White House Ordered The Dept Of Defense To Limit Your Access To Guns!!

Published on August 17, 2023
0

This video critically analyzes a White House executive order that directs the Department of Defense to leverage firearm procurement to influence American safety and potentially push 'smart' gun technologies into the civilian market. The speaker, demonstrating high authority and expertise, cites historical examples like Colt's temporary halt on civilian sales due to military contracts and questions the legality of using procurement for social engineering rather than defined military missions.

Quick Summary

The White House directed the Department of Defense (DOD) to use firearm acquisition to enhance American safety, potentially impacting civilian gun availability and pushing technologies like microstamping. This strategy leverages government contracts to influence manufacturers, raising legal questions about the DOD's mission focus.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Executive Order Context
  2. 00:42Market Impact and Manufacturer Priorities
  3. 01:45Smart Gun Technology and Microstamping
  4. 02:45Legal and Mission Focus Concerns

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the primary reason cited for the White House ordering the Department of Defense to limit access to guns?

The White House directed the Department of Defense (DOD) to use firearm acquisition as a means to further American safety, potentially influencing the civilian market and pushing new technologies.

How might government firearm procurement affect civilian gun availability?

Large government contracts can incentivize manufacturers to prioritize military production, potentially leading to reduced availability or temporary cessation of civilian sales, as seen historically with companies like Colt.

What is 'microstamping' and how could it be introduced to the civilian market?

Microstamping is a technology that marks cartridge cases with identifying information. Government procurement standards could be leveraged to financially encourage or mandate its adoption by manufacturers for civilian firearms.

What legal concerns are raised regarding the DOD's role in firearm policy?

Critics question the legality of using DOD procurement for social or market engineering, arguing that the department should focus on clearly defined military missions rather than influencing civilian firearm technology or access.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from GFG

View all →