When a Majority of States Call BS on Your Gun Laws

This video discusses the legal challenge to Washington State's magazine ban, specifically focusing on the state's response brief in Gators Custom Guns v. Washington State. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law analyzes how the state argues that magazines are not protected by the Second Amendment and that state legislatures have broad power to ban items, even if they are constitutionally protected. The content encourages viewers to educate themselves on these legal issues.

This video explores a hypothetical scenario: what if the Second Amendment was treated with the same legal scrutiny and respect as the First Amendment? William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, discusses an Amicus brief in Wolford v. Lopez that raises this question. He notes that recent Supreme Court Second Amendment cases have already drawn comparisons to First Amendment jurisprudence, suggesting this approach has precedent. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on their rights and provides links to the NAGR Amicus brief and opportunities to support their advocacy.

This video discusses a recent court ruling concerning switchblades and its potential implications for Second Amendment rights. The speaker, Anna, argues that even though knives are not firearms, they are considered "arms." The ruling's legal analysis, if flawed, could set a dangerous precedent that might negatively impact future cases involving firearms, such as those concerning magazines or semi-automatic rifles commonly referred to as "assault weapons." The video emphasizes the importance of pushing back against such rulings to protect broader gun rights, particularly within the Ninth Circuit.

This video discusses two important petitions before the Supreme Court that could significantly impact American gun ownership rights. William Kirk from Washington Gun Law explains the issues raised in Perez v. United States and Morgan v. United States, highlighting how these cases represent ongoing efforts by some states to disarm their citizens. While acknowledging the critical nature of these legal battles, Kirk suggests that the petitions may not be accepted by the Court. The video encourages viewers to educate themselves on these matters to better understand the evolving landscape of Second Amendment rights.

This video discusses the historical and ongoing efforts to disarm Americans, focusing on how felony convictions can lead to lifetime firearm bans, regardless of the nature of the offense. Washington Gun Law President William Kirk highlights the impact of these laws, particularly from the perspective of public defenders. The discussion centers on a significant case before the U.S. Supreme Court that could potentially restore Second Amendment rights for millions. The video also promotes "Right to Bear," a self-defense protection service, and encourages viewers to engage with Washington Gun Law through their newsletter, website, and social media channels.

This video discusses the legal challenges to federal firearm prohibition for cannabis users, focusing on the case of Harris v. United States before the Supreme Court. The speaker, William Kirk from Washington Gun Law, contrasts this case with the "Hemani" case, arguing that "Harris" offers a cleaner opportunity to constitutionally challenge the law (18 USC 922(g)(3)) due to its more favorable operative facts. The content encourages viewers to arm themselves with education on this critical Second Amendment issue and promotes affiliated organizations offering legal protection and advocacy.

This guide, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, outlines tactical and legal considerations for drivers encountering mob situations. It emphasizes de-escalation, identifying escape routes, and understanding the legal thresholds for self-defense, particularly the distinction between property damage and threats to human life. Kirk, a legal instructor, stresses the importance of restraint and lawful action.

This video, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, explores the complex legal question of whether one can legally shoot back at police if they are unlawfully firing. Kirk emphasizes that while a legal right to self-defense against imminent threats of death or serious bodily harm exists, the decision to use lethal force, especially against law enforcement, involves significant tactical and legal considerations beyond mere legality. The discussion highlights foundational self-defense principles and specific legal doctrines like the Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground.

This video, featuring William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, details how sheriffs in Arkansas are pushing back against federal gun control measures, particularly the ATF's pistol brace rule. It highlights Arkansas Act 1012 and state code 21-1-904, which aim to prevent state and local officials from enforcing federal firearms regulations deemed unconstitutional infringements on Second Amendment rights. The Arkansas Sheriff's Association has officially stated their non-support for enforcing such rules, prioritizing focus on violent offenders.

William Kirk from Washington Gun Law clarifies that the ATF cannot demand inspection of non-NFA firearms without a warrant. While NFA ownership doesn't waive Fourth Amendment rights, FFLs are subject to annual inspections, a rule not applicable to private individuals. If ATF agents arrive without a warrant, consent is typically required, and politely declining is advised.