Why This Pistol Brace Ruling is So Huge
This video provides an expert analysis of the significant 'Mock v. Garland' ruling concerning pistol braces. William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, explains how the ruling strikes down the ATF's rule on Second Amendment grounds, specifically the 'common use' doctrine, rather than solely on Administrative Procedure Act violations. The ruling validates that braced pistols are commonly possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, a precedent reinforced by Supreme Court cases like Heller and Bruen.











