Air Force Most Lethal Weapon BANNED

Published on April 7, 2023
Duration: 13:14

The A-10 Thunderbolt II, or Warthog, remains a highly effective close air support aircraft despite plans for its phase-out in favor of the F-35. Its GAU-8 Avenger 30mm Gatling gun is a formidable weapon, and the aircraft's robust design and lower operational costs make it a compelling platform for ground support missions.

Quick Summary

The A-10 Thunderbolt II, or Warthog, is renowned for its close air support (CAS) capabilities, primarily delivered by its GAU-8 Avenger 30mm Gatling gun firing at 3,900 rounds per minute. Despite Air Force plans to phase it out for the F-35, its robust design and lower maintenance costs keep it a relevant and lethal platform.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introducing the A-10 Warthog
  2. 01:51A-10 Retirement & F-35 Transition
  3. 04:22GAU-8 Avenger Gun Details
  4. 05:18A-10 Ordnance and Hard Points
  5. 06:59Pilot Training and Simulation
  6. 11:45A-10 vs F-35 Maintenance Costs

Frequently Asked Questions

What makes the A-10 Thunderbolt II a lethal weapon?

The A-10's lethality stems from its powerful GAU-8 Avenger 30mm Gatling gun, capable of firing 3,900 rounds per minute, and its robust design optimized for close air support (CAS), allowing it to withstand significant damage while delivering heavy ordnance.

Why is the A-10 being phased out by the Air Force?

The Air Force plans to replace the A-10 with the F-35 Lightning II, aiming for a more versatile, stealth-capable aircraft. However, critics argue the F-35 lacks the A-10's specialized durability and effectiveness in close air support roles.

What are the key technical specifications of the A-10's GAU-8 Avenger gun?

The GAU-8 Avenger is a 30mm Gatling gun, the largest ever mounted on an airplane. It fires at a rate of approximately 3,900 rounds per minute and is a primary component of the A-10's close air support capabilities.

How does the A-10's maintenance cost compare to the F-35?

In 2020, the A-10 fleet's annual maintenance costs were reported at $503 million, while the F-35 fleet's costs were higher at $606 million, indicating the A-10 remains a cost-effective platform despite its age.

More General Videos You Might Like

More from Nikko Ortiz

View all →