What if the M16 never happened? The T44 vs. T48 Edition.

Published on February 19, 2022
Duration: 14:06

This video delves into a hypothetical scenario where the FN FAL (designated T48 in US trials) was adopted over the M14 (T44), and subsequently, the M16. It explores the historical context of post-WWII firearm development, NATO standardization efforts, and the critical decisions that led to the M16's adoption. The expert analysis highlights the technical merits and drawbacks of the T48 and M14, the impact of cartridge choices, and the long-term consequences for US military small arms.

Quick Summary

The T48 vs. T44 trials were pivotal in US military rifle selection, with the T44 becoming the M14 and the T48 representing the FN FAL. The US decision to standardize NATO on the 7.62x51mm cartridge, despite its challenges for select-fire use, ultimately influenced the M14's short service life and paved the way for the M16, breaking earlier promises to allies.

Chapters

  1. 00:10Introduction: M16 Alternative History
  2. 00:37M16 Adoption and M14 Service
  3. 01:21Post-WWII Infantry Rifle Trends
  4. 02:00NATO Standardization and US Promise
  5. 02:35.308 vs Intermediate Cartridge
  6. 02:46T44/M14 vs T48/FAL Trials
  7. 03:23M14 Arctic Trials Controversy
  8. 04:23M14's Short Service Life
  9. 05:10T48/FAL Features Discussion
  10. 05:23Primary Arms Promotion
  11. 06:10Ammunition & T48 Details
  12. 06:38British Intermediate Cartridge
  13. 07:44US Military Decision Factors
  14. 08:01FN FAL Global Adoption
  15. 08:25T48 Unique Features
  16. 09:25T48 Carry Handle and Open Action
  17. 10:46T48 Trigger Guard and Last Round Hold Open
  18. 11:47Alternative History Question
  19. 12:22Modern Gun School Promotion
  20. 12:49Concluding Thoughts and Call to Action

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the significance of the T48 vs. T44 trials?

The T48 vs. T44 trials were crucial in determining the US military's next service rifle. The T44 evolved into the M14, while the T48 was the US designation for the FN FAL. The outcome significantly influenced the subsequent adoption of the M16 and NATO's cartridge standardization.

Why did the M14 have a short service life?

The M14, adopted from 1959-1964, had the shortest service life of any US infantry rifle. Factors included its full-power .308 cartridge being difficult to control in full-auto, and the US military's eventual shift to the lighter, intermediate-caliber 5.56mm M16 in 1965.

What were the key features of the T48 rifle?

The T48, a variant of the FN FAL, featured a long flash hider, lightweight barrel, standard gas adjustment, and a unique front sight. It also incorporated a winter trigger guard and last-round bolt hold open, though it used less durable wood furniture and had an open bolt design when locked back.

What was the impact of NATO cartridge standardization?

NATO standardization on the 7.62x51mm NATO (.308 Win) cartridge, pushed by the US, created challenges for select-fire rifles due to its power and recoil. This decision arguably hindered the adoption of more suitable intermediate cartridges favored by some allies.

More General Videos You Might Like

More from Military Arms Channel

View all →