Ruger 10/22 vs Cans | .22 vs cans

This video addresses the question of whether it is safe to shoot a .22LR firearm without ear protection. It explores the potential risks and considerations associated with shooting this caliber without hearing protection. The content likely aims to educate viewers on firearm safety and the importance of hearing protection in shooting environments.

This YouTube video title, "Será que você consegue encontrar sua bala?" (Can you find your bullet?), suggests a content focus on shooting, potentially involving a challenge, a game, or an observation related to ammunition after firing. Without a description or transcript, the exact nature is unclear, but it strongly implies a firearm-related activity. The title hints at a scenario where the outcome of a shot or the whereabouts of the projectile are central to the video's narrative. It could be a test of accuracy, a discussion on projectile behavior, or a more abstract concept related to shooting. The Portuguese language indicates a target audience in Brazil or other Portuguese-speaking regions.

This YouTube Shorts video appears to capture a moment of frustration during a firearms-related activity, indicated by the title "Crashout over 22lr Malfunction!!!". The description "We’ve all had one of those days…. " suggests a relatable experience of a firearm issue. While the specific firearm is not explicitly stated beyond the caliber, the context points towards a shooting or range-related scenario.

This video details an accuracy test of the Ruger LCP II in .22LR at various distances, from 1 yard up to 12 yards. The reviewer uses a progressive distance methodology, documenting group sizes and noting any malfunctions. The test highlights how accuracy degrades with distance, with the firearm remaining effective for human-sized targets up to approximately 12 yards, depending on ammunition. The reviewer also comments on the challenges of aiming at distance due to the small front sight.

This video focuses on the satisfying experience of shooting steel targets, highlighting the auditory and visual feedback. While the specific firearms and calibers used are not detailed in the provided description, the title strongly suggests a practical demonstration of shooting firearms and their effectiveness on steel targets. The content is likely aimed at firearm enthusiasts who appreciate the tactile and auditory aspects of range shooting.

This YouTube video documents an invitation to an "Epic Range Day 2024" hosted by SIG Sauer. While the video content itself isn't detailed, the title and description emphasize an educational purpose, safe and controlled environments, and a focus on firearms. The creator also provides links for channel support and a mailing address for fan mail.

This video compares the terminal performance of five common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) by shooting watermelons. The test demonstrates a significant increase in destructive power from .22LR up to .45 ACP, with the larger calibers causing more explosive expansion and fragmentation. Specific hollow-point ammunition from Speer, Aguila, and Underwood was used, highlighting the importance of bullet construction for terminal ballistics.

Buckeye Ballistics conducted a comparative test of common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) against concrete blocks. The host, demonstrating significant firearm and ballistics knowledge, emphasized extreme safety precautions due to ricochet risks. The test revealed that while larger calibers showed more damage, none could fully penetrate the concrete block's second wall, suggesting limitations for self-defense scenarios against hardened barriers.

This Taurus TX22 review details its performance with various .22 LR ammunition. While initially reliable with CCI Mini-Mags and cycling standard velocity rounds well, it encountered malfunctions with sub-sonic and high-velocity loads. A catastrophic failure occurred due to a squib load followed by a second shot, resulting in a bulged barrel and damaged magazine.

This video compares the terminal ballistics of .22LR, .22WMR, and .17HMR rimfire cartridges using cantaloupes as targets. The .22LR showed a clean pass-through with minor damage, the .22WMR caused an explosive front-face disintegration, and the .17HMR, despite its speed, disintegrated internally with no exit. The test highlights how different rimfire rounds perform on soft tissue simulants.