.22WMR Pistol Ballistic Gel Test Maxi-Mag TNT vs Speer TNT vs TNT Green

This video conducts a ballistic gelatin test comparing Federal Speer TNT .22WMR and Remington Accutip .22WMR ammunition. The content focuses on evaluating the terminal ballistics of these two .22 Magnum loads, likely assessing penetration, expansion, and retained energy. The description also lists various equipment used, including steel targets, cameras, editing software, hearing protection, safety glasses, and ballistic gelatin powder, suggesting a well-equipped reviewer.

This YouTube video features a ballistic gel test of Speer Gold Dot .22WMR ammunition. The test is conducted using two distinct firearms: the new Walther WMP pistol and a Heritage Barkeep revolver. The primary focus is to evaluate the self-defense performance of the .22 Magnum ammunition from both platforms. The video aims to provide insights into the effectiveness of this specific ammunition type in a defensive scenario by analyzing its penetration and expansion within ballistic gel. It is explicitly stated that the content is for informational purposes only and not for sale.

This YouTube video features a ballistic gel test of .22WMR pistol rounds fired from a rifle. The description includes links to other pistol tests, a review of the RS22M, and a comprehensive list of equipment used regularly in the creator's videos, including firearms accessories, shooting gear, and video production equipment. The content focuses on the performance of specific ammunition in a gel medium, offering insights into terminal ballistics.

This video features a ballistic gel test and review of the Armscor .22WMR pistol and rifle. It also includes links to reviews of the Taurus 942 UL and Rossi RS22M. The description details various shooting equipment used by the creator, including steel targets, cameras, editing software, ear protection, safety glasses, ballistic gelatin, scales, calipers, denim, rangefinders, shooting rests, chronographs, target stands, and various types of targets and ammo boxes. The creator is an Amazon Associate and earns from qualifying purchases.

This video features a ballistic gel test comparing Federal Punch and Winchester Silvertip ammunition in .22 Magnum caliber. The review aims to evaluate the terminal performance of these popular self-defense rounds. The description also lists various gear used by the creator, including firearms accessories and video equipment, along with links to other related videos such as a Taurus 942 review and a PMR30 gel test.

This YouTube video focuses on a velocity test of .22 WMR (22 Magnum) ammunition, likely using a chronograph. The description mentions a review of the Rossi RS22M rifle and a WIN Varmint HV Gel Test, indicating a thorough examination of the cartridge's performance. It also provides links to various gear used in the video, including steel targets, cameras, and ballistic gelatin supplies, suggesting a practical, range-focused approach to evaluating ammunition and firearms.

This video compares the terminal performance of five common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) by shooting watermelons. The test demonstrates a significant increase in destructive power from .22LR up to .45 ACP, with the larger calibers causing more explosive expansion and fragmentation. Specific hollow-point ammunition from Speer, Aguila, and Underwood was used, highlighting the importance of bullet construction for terminal ballistics.

Buckeye Ballistics conducted a comparative test of common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) against concrete blocks. The host, demonstrating significant firearm and ballistics knowledge, emphasized extreme safety precautions due to ricochet risks. The test revealed that while larger calibers showed more damage, none could fully penetrate the concrete block's second wall, suggesting limitations for self-defense scenarios against hardened barriers.

This Taurus TX22 review details its performance with various .22 LR ammunition. While initially reliable with CCI Mini-Mags and cycling standard velocity rounds well, it encountered malfunctions with sub-sonic and high-velocity loads. A catastrophic failure occurred due to a squib load followed by a second shot, resulting in a bulged barrel and damaged magazine.

This video compares the terminal ballistics of .22LR, .22WMR, and .17HMR rimfire cartridges using cantaloupes as targets. The .22LR showed a clean pass-through with minor damage, the .22WMR caused an explosive front-face disintegration, and the .17HMR, despite its speed, disintegrated internally with no exit. The test highlights how different rimfire rounds perform on soft tissue simulants.