Arsenal SLR107 1000rds Later - Bubbles Attack!

Published on May 4, 2016
Duration: 11:48

This review details the initial 1,000 rounds of an Arsenal SLR107FR endurance test, highlighting significant quality control issues despite functional mechanical accuracy. Experts from AK Operators Union, Local 47-74, noted poor finish durability, canted sights, and a subpar trigger, while confirming the rifle's ability to hold zero and achieve good accuracy at distance. The assessment emphasizes the discrepancy between the rifle's price point and its manufacturing quality.

Quick Summary

The Arsenal SLR107FR endured 1000 rounds with notable quality control issues, including finish bubbling, canted sights, and a poor trigger. Despite these flaws, the rifle maintained mechanical accuracy, zeroed correctly, and achieved good hit rates at distance, though internal inspections revealed metal shavings and a deformed rivet.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction & Headspace Check
  2. 00:51Cosmetic & Finish Issues
  3. 01:33Sighting & Manufacturing Flaws
  4. 02:10Accuracy & Zeroing
  5. 03:18Trigger Assessment
  6. 04:02Long Range Performance
  7. 04:49Internal Wear Inspection
  8. 10:15Rust & Final Thoughts

Frequently Asked Questions

What were the main quality control issues found on the Arsenal SLR107FR after 1000 rounds?

After 1000 rounds, the Arsenal SLR107FR showed significant paint bubbling and flaking on the barrel and gas block, a canted rear sight post, a slightly canted gas block, a large gap in the rear sight block, and a poorly formed rivet on the receiver. Rust was also found under the flaking paint.

How did the Arsenal SLR107FR perform in terms of accuracy despite its cosmetic flaws?

Despite its numerous cosmetic and alignment issues, the Arsenal SLR107FR proved to be mechanically accurate. Shooters were able to zero the rifle and achieve high hit rates at distances of 200 and 300 yards using iron sights, indicating functional accuracy.

What was the assessment of the Arsenal SLR107FR's factory trigger?

The factory Arsenal trigger was described as 'horrible' by the reviewers, with a pull compared to dragging a heavy object through gravel. It was deemed significantly inferior to common triggers like the Tapco G2.

Were there any signs of internal wear or damage after the initial 1000 rounds?

During a detailed teardown, the bolt carrier, piston head, and tail showed good durability. However, metal shavings were found inside the trunnion surfaces, and one rivet on the receiver was noted as poorly formed or smashed.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from AK Operators Union, Local 47-74

View all →