Bersa Thunder .380 & Combat Review and Shoot

This video compares the Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 1.0 and 2.0, focusing on their performance at 40 feet. The reviewer notes the 1.0's double-action-only trigger and smaller profile, while the 2.0 features a striker-fired mechanism, improved grip, and better sights. Both pistols experienced some feeding issues with bargain-brand ammunition but performed well with Winchester White Box.

This video provides a detailed comparison of the Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 Carry Comp (.380 ACP) and the Smith & Wesson Shield X (9mm) for concealed carry. The presenter, Phil from USCCA, highlights differences in concealability, stopping power, magazine capacity, recoil management, accuracy, and reload speed, offering insights for end-users to make an informed decision based on their priorities.

This review of the Sig P238 highlights its premium build and reliable function, but ultimately advises against purchasing it as a primary EDC or backup gun. The instructor argues its all-metal construction, while contributing to shootability, makes it too heavy for common concealed carry methods like pocket or ankle carry. He also points to its limited magazine capacity and basic iron sights as significant drawbacks for its premium price point.

This video compares the Ruger LCP and Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 1.0 for pocket carry. The reviewer found the Bodyguard 1.0 to be more accurate and comfortable to shoot due to its better sights and smoother trigger, despite experiencing some light primer strikes with subpar ammunition. The LCP was deemed extremely reliable, though its trigger pinch and less visible sights impacted accuracy. Both firearms performed reliably with quality ammunition.

This video reviews a list of firearms that the channel claims Americans will 'never buy,' detailing their features, drawbacks, and market reception. It covers a range of handguns and rifles, from the Glock 37 in 45GAP to the High Point C9 and large caliber magnums, highlighting issues like reliability, ergonomics, cost, and niche appeal. The presenter discusses why these specific models failed to gain widespread popularity or are considered less desirable for various reasons.

The Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 is a popular .380 ACP firearm, often chosen for concealed carry due to its compact size and included pocket holster. The host highlights its convenience for quick outings and mentions it's a featured firearm in tonight's giveaway. While not extensively detailed, the discussion implies it's a reliable and practical option for everyday carry.

This video from Buckeye Ballistics provides a practical, albeit unconventional, comparison of five common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) by shooting watermelons. The expert demonstrates varying levels of terminal performance, from the .22LR's significant splitting to the .45 ACP's complete watermelon fragmentation, highlighting the differences in hydraulic shock and expansion. The test utilizes specific hollow-point ammunition, including Speer Gold Dot, Aguila Super Maximum, and Underwood XTP, showcasing their effects.

This video provides a practical, safety-conscious comparison of common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) against concrete blocks. The host, demonstrating high authority and expertise, details the testing methodology and results, emphasizing the risks of ricochet. None of the tested pistol calibers fully penetrated the concrete block's second wall, suggesting their limitations for certain penetration scenarios.

This review of the Taurus TX22 .22 LR pistol details its features, including a 16+1 capacity and excellent trigger. While initial testing with CCI Mini-Mags was flawless, subsequent tests with various ammunition types revealed cycling issues and culminated in a catastrophic failure. The failure was attributed to a squib load followed by a second shot, causing a barrel bulge and ruptured casing, highlighting potential ammunition inconsistencies. The review provides a detailed look at disassembly and damage assessment.

This video from Buckeye Ballistics provides an experimental comparison of three popular rimfire calibers: .22LR, .22WMR, and .17HMR, using cantaloupes as ballistic mediums. The host, an experienced shooter, demonstrates the distinct terminal ballistics of each round, highlighting how bullet construction and velocity affect target interaction. The comparison offers practical insights into the performance differences between these rimfire cartridges on soft tissue simulants.