DSA 58 FAL Review by Nutnfancy

Published on May 11, 2019
Duration: 26:17

This review of the DSA 58 FAL by Nutnfancy highlights its historical significance as a battle rifle but questions its modern tactical utility. While praised for accuracy with certain ammunition and its smooth shooting characteristics, its considerable weight (over 11 lbs), heat transfer through the metal handguard, and heavy trigger pull (8-10 lbs) make it less practical than contemporary AR-10 platforms. The reviewer suggests it's best suited as a recreational or historical piece rather than a primary 'go-to-war' rifle.

Quick Summary

The DSA 58 FAL is a heavy rifle (over 11 lbs) with accuracy around 3 MOA at 100 yards. Its metal handguard transfers significant heat, and the trigger pull is heavy (8-10 lbs). Nutnfancy considers it more of a recreational or historical piece than a primary tactical rifle compared to modern AR-10 platforms.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction & Sponsorship
  2. 00:18Initial Shooting Impressions & Recoil
  3. 01:33Testing & Accuracy Results
  4. 03:15Weight & Ergonomics Issues
  5. 07:11DSA Model Variations & Part Quality
  6. 08:15Philosophy of Use (POU)
  7. 13:07Technical Features & Trigger Pull
  8. 14:30Final Verdict & M1A Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main drawbacks of the DSA 58 FAL for modern use?

The DSA 58 FAL's main drawbacks include its significant weight (over 11 lbs), heat transfer through the metal handguard during rapid fire, and a heavy trigger pull. These factors make it less practical than lighter, more accurate, and modular modern rifle platforms.

How accurate is the DSA 58 FAL?

Accuracy at 50 yards with Wolf steel-cased ammo was described as 'excellent'. At 100 yards, using various NATO spec and PMC ammo, the rifle typically produced groups around 3 MOA, which is considered standard for the FAL platform.

What is Nutnfancy's philosophy of use for the DSA 58 FAL?

Nutnfancy views the FAL primarily as a 'second cool' or recreational rifle. He would not choose it as a primary 'go-to-war' rifle today, preferring lighter, more accurate, and modular modern AR-10 platforms for tactical applications.

Are there differences in DSA FAL models regarding parts quality?

Yes, older DSA FAL models often used more forged surplus parts. Newer budget models, like the Voyager, may use cast parts, which Nutnfancy advises against for hard use due to potential durability issues.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from nutnfancy

View all →