How Lethal is The POISON BULLET?! (vs Zombie HEAD)

The Garand Thumb video thoroughly tests the Russian 7N6 5.45x39mm 'Poison Bullet', demonstrating its extreme terminal ballistics due to immediate yawing and tumbling in ballistic gel. Compared to the M855, the 7N6 creates a more violent wound channel. The video also debunks the ATF's 'armor-piercing' classification, showing the round fails to penetrate soft armor, arguing the ban was based on a technicality.

This video features an informal ammunition test of the 5.45x39 caliber using a Vepr rifle. The creator compares the performance of Golden Tiger, Red Army Standard, Silver Bear, and WPA ammunition brands. The video aims to identify any noticeable differences in performance between these various ammunition types for the AK-74 platform.

This Shop Talk episode addresses the 7N6 ammunition ban, reassuring viewers that the 5.45x39 caliber remains viable due to ample commercial ammo availability. The discussion highlights the ballistic advantages of 5.45x39 over 7.62x39, including reduced recoil and a flatter trajectory. A Waffen Werks AK-74 with a milled receiver is showcased as a strong option.

This YouTube video showcases a ballistics gel test featuring Golden Tiger 5.45x39mm FMJ ammunition fired from an Arsenal SGL-31 AK rifle. The test is presented in high definition, offering a clear visual of the ammunition's performance upon impact with the gel. The video aims to provide insights into the terminal ballistics of this specific round when used in a popular AK platform.

This video features an initial review and range test of the Palmetto State Armory (PSA) Krink rifle chambered in 5.45x39mm. The reviewer shares their first impressions, takes the firearm to the range for drills, showcases their EDC bag with the Krink, and discusses their experience while shooting it for the first time. The description also includes links to the creator's kit page, sponsors, Patreon, merchandise, social media, and camera gear.

This video details modifications to a limited edition IWI Galil ACE in 5.45x39, transforming it into a highly capable training tool. The speaker, demonstrating high authority, explains the rationale behind choosing 5.45x39, particularly its cost-effectiveness during the 2020 ammo crisis. Key upgrades include an RS Regulate rail, KNS adjustable gas piston, and an SB Tactical brace, enhancing its functionality for high-volume shooting.

This video rigorously tests the self-defense capabilities of various airguns against a realistic human head ballistic target. The expert instructor demonstrates that low-power BB guns like the Daisy Red Rider offer minimal threat, while even full-auto CO2 BB guns fail to penetrate the skull. However, a high-velocity Gamo pellet rifle proves capable of causing significant damage, cracking the skull. The instructor concludes that BB guns are unsuitable for self-defense, and while pellet rifles are dangerous, they lack the immediate stopping power of conventional firearms.

This video tests the BulletSafe VP3 Level IIIA vest against various calibers up to .44 Magnum using a realistic human torso dummy. While the vest stopped all tested rounds, including a .44 Magnum and 12-gauge buckshot, significant backface deformation and blunt force trauma were evident, especially with higher-energy rounds. The dummy's shoulder blade was broken by buckshot, and severe bruising was indicated by the .44 Magnum impact.

This review of the Crosman DPMS SBR full-auto BB gun highlights its realistic AR-15 SBR aesthetics and select-fire capability. The host demonstrates its operation, including loading with a speedloader and the dual CO2 power system. Performance metrics like 1400 RPM and 430 FPS are discussed, along with its accuracy and destructive potential on targets like watermelons. The device is recommended for realistic training or plinking where live firearms are impractical.

This video tests the effectiveness and dangers of using a flare gun for self-defense. While a flare gun can ignite materials and cause internal damage to a ballistic torso, its single-shot capacity, slow reload, and high risk of starting fires make it an irresponsible and dangerous choice for defense. The test highlights the unpredictable nature and significant fire hazard associated with using flare guns in a defensive scenario.