M2 Carbine vs MP44 Sturmgewehr (w/ John Keene)

Published on August 30, 2025
Duration: 1:07

This review compares the M2 Carbine and the MP44 Sturmgewehr, highlighting differing expert opinions on their combat effectiveness. John Keene favors the MP44 for its armor-piercing capabilities and ergonomics, while Ian McCollum argues for the M2 Carbine's lighter weight and handiness. Both acknowledge the practical irrelevance of long-range accuracy in modern warfare.

Quick Summary

The M2 Carbine is favored for its lighter weight (approx. 5.2 lbs) and handiness compared to the MP44 Sturmgewehr (approx. 10.2 lbs). While the MP44 offers better armor penetration, their practical combat effectiveness is often seen as similar, with long-range accuracy being rarely utilized.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Sturmgewehr Preference vs. M2 Carbine
  2. 00:22M2 Carbine Ergonomics and Weight Advantage
  3. 00:45Combat Range and Ballistics Relevance

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key differences between the M2 Carbine and the MP44 Sturmgewehr?

The M2 Carbine is significantly lighter (approx. 5.2 lbs) and handier than the MP44 Sturmgewehr (approx. 10.2 lbs). While the MP44 has a more powerful cartridge and better armor-piercing capacity, their practical combat effectiveness is often considered similar.

Why might someone prefer the MP44 Sturmgewehr over the M2 Carbine?

Preference for the MP44 often stems from its superior armor-piercing capabilities and perceived better ergonomics. Some users simply enjoy the feel and handling of the Sturmgewehr more, despite its heavier weight.

Is long-range accuracy important for WWII-era rifles like the M2 Carbine and MP44?

Experts suggest long-range accuracy is largely irrelevant in modern combat. Historical data indicates individual rifleman shots beyond 200 yards are extremely rare, making factors like weight and handling more critical.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Forgotten Weapons

View all →