MP-40 vs PPSh-41 (w/ John Keene)

Published on August 16, 2025
Duration: 0:59

This comparison between the MP-40 and PPSh-41 highlights differing design philosophies. John Keene favors the MP-40 for its ergonomics and adaptations for higher magazine capacity, while Ian McCollum prefers the PPSh-41 for its high rate of fire and semi-auto selector. Both speakers acknowledge the controllability of their preferred weapon despite its characteristics.

Quick Summary

The MP-40 and PPSh-41 submachine guns are compared, with John Keene favoring the MP-40 for ergonomics and magazine capacity, while Ian McCollum prefers the PPSh-41's high rate of fire and semi-auto selector. Both are considered controllable.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: MP-40 vs PPSh-41
  2. 00:06John Keene's MP-40 Preference
  3. 00:19Ian McCollum's PPSh-41 Preference
  4. 00:34Rate of Fire and Control Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key differences between the MP-40 and PPSh-41?

The MP-40 is favored by some for its ergonomics and adaptations for higher magazine capacity, while the PPSh-41 is noted for its high rate of fire and inclusion of a semi-auto selector, which the MP-40 lacks.

Which submachine gun has a higher rate of fire, the MP-40 or PPSh-41?

The PPSh-41 features a significantly higher rate of fire compared to the MP-40. Despite its high rate, the PPSh-41 is still considered controllable by experts.

Does the MP-40 have a semi-automatic firing mode?

No, the MP-40 is generally considered a full-auto only submachine gun. The PPSh-41, however, includes a selector for both semi-automatic and full-automatic fire.

What makes the MP-40's ergonomics superior for single rounds?

John Keene suggests that German adaptations for the MP-40 provide superior ergonomics specifically for firing single rounds accurately, contributing to its perceived control.

Related News

All News โ†’

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Forgotten Weapons

View all โ†’