MP-40 vs PPSh-41 (w/ John Keene)

Published on August 16, 2025
Duration: 0:59

This comparison between the MP-40 and PPSh-41 highlights differing design philosophies. John Keene favors the MP-40 for its ergonomics and adaptations for higher magazine capacity, while Ian McCollum prefers the PPSh-41 for its high rate of fire and semi-auto selector. Both speakers acknowledge the controllability of their preferred weapon despite its characteristics.

Quick Summary

The MP-40 and PPSh-41 submachine guns are compared, with John Keene favoring the MP-40 for ergonomics and magazine capacity, while Ian McCollum prefers the PPSh-41's high rate of fire and semi-auto selector. Both are considered controllable.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: MP-40 vs PPSh-41
  2. 00:06John Keene's MP-40 Preference
  3. 00:19Ian McCollum's PPSh-41 Preference
  4. 00:34Rate of Fire and Control Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key differences between the MP-40 and PPSh-41?

The MP-40 is favored by some for its ergonomics and adaptations for higher magazine capacity, while the PPSh-41 is noted for its high rate of fire and inclusion of a semi-auto selector, which the MP-40 lacks.

Which submachine gun has a higher rate of fire, the MP-40 or PPSh-41?

The PPSh-41 features a significantly higher rate of fire compared to the MP-40. Despite its high rate, the PPSh-41 is still considered controllable by experts.

Does the MP-40 have a semi-automatic firing mode?

No, the MP-40 is generally considered a full-auto only submachine gun. The PPSh-41, however, includes a selector for both semi-automatic and full-automatic fire.

What makes the MP-40's ergonomics superior for single rounds?

John Keene suggests that German adaptations for the MP-40 provide superior ergonomics specifically for firing single rounds accurately, contributing to its perceived control.

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Forgotten Weapons

View all →