NEW Taurus GX2 Review & Shoot 13+1 9mm Sub Compact G2C Replacement

The Taurus GX2 is reviewed as an underwhelming addition to the market, offering little innovation over existing models. Despite being purchased at a bargain price for personal testing, the firearm failed to impress during range tests, showing no standout features in cycling or accuracy. The reviewer concludes it doesn't differentiate itself from competitors.

This YouTube video, titled "NEW Taurus GX2 - Still Underwhelming?", features a review of the Taurus GX2 pistol. The description implies the reviewer may regret their purchase, with the tagline "I Bought it Fool". The video aims to assess whether the Taurus GX2 lives up to expectations and provides links to various playlists including handgun reviews, long gun reviews, Second Amendment content, gear reviews, and range tests. Social media links are also provided.

This video delves into the Taurus G2c, a popular polymer-framed pistol, questioning the reasons behind potential misrepresentations or criticisms. The title suggests a critical examination of common opinions and a defense or clarification of the firearm's performance and features. It aims to address controversies or misunderstandings surrounding the Taurus G2c, likely offering the creator's perspective based on their experience or research.

This video, part of the "I Carry" series, features a review of the Taurus GX2 9mm pistol, highlighting its features as an entry-level concealed carry option. The review details its striker-fired operation, 13-round magazine capacity, basic sights, accessory rail, and manual thumb safety. Notably, the GX2 lacks an optics cut, a deliberate choice by Taurus based on consumer preference. The pistol's dimensions are discussed for its suitability for concealed carry and home defense. The review emphasizes the GX2's reliability, citing extensive testing with minimal malfunctions attributed to operator error. It also mentions compatibility with Viridian lasers and GX4 Carry magazines for increased capacity. The video showcases the pistol in a PHLster Skeleton holster with a UM Tactical spare magazine carrier, underscoring its use in everyday carry setups.

This video features a review of the Taurus GX2 pistol as part of a "Cheap Pistol Series." The host aims to find the best pistol under $400, with a focus on budget-friendly options. The video explores the performance of the Taurus GX2 within this price range and offers links to support the "Three of Seven Project." The content is geared towards budget-conscious firearm owners and those looking for affordable self-defense or general shooting options.

This YouTube video offers a direct comparison between two Taurus pistol models: the G3C and the GX2. The creator aims to determine which of these firearms is superior. The description also provides links to various playlists covering handgun and long gun reviews, content related to the Second Amendment, gear and accessory reviews, and range test reviews. Additionally, social media links for Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram are included.

This video compares the terminal performance of five common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) by shooting watermelons. The test demonstrates a significant increase in destructive power from .22LR up to .45 ACP, with the larger calibers causing more explosive expansion and fragmentation. Specific hollow-point ammunition from Speer, Aguila, and Underwood was used, highlighting the importance of bullet construction for terminal ballistics.

Buckeye Ballistics conducted a comparative test of common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) against concrete blocks. The host, demonstrating significant firearm and ballistics knowledge, emphasized extreme safety precautions due to ricochet risks. The test revealed that while larger calibers showed more damage, none could fully penetrate the concrete block's second wall, suggesting limitations for self-defense scenarios against hardened barriers.

This Taurus TX22 review details its performance with various .22 LR ammunition. While initially reliable with CCI Mini-Mags and cycling standard velocity rounds well, it encountered malfunctions with sub-sonic and high-velocity loads. A catastrophic failure occurred due to a squib load followed by a second shot, resulting in a bulged barrel and damaged magazine.

This video compares the terminal ballistics of .22LR, .22WMR, and .17HMR rimfire cartridges using cantaloupes as targets. The .22LR showed a clean pass-through with minor damage, the .22WMR caused an explosive front-face disintegration, and the .17HMR, despite its speed, disintegrated internally with no exit. The test highlights how different rimfire rounds perform on soft tissue simulants.