Sig V-Crown .40S&W 180gr Ballistic Gel Test & Review

This YouTube video features a ballistic gel test and review of the Sig V-Crown .45ACP 230gr ammunition. The content creator also provides links to various gear they use regularly in their videos, including steel targets, cameras, editing equipment, hearing protection, safety glasses, ballistic gelatin powder, scales, calipers, denim, rangefinders, shooting rests, chronographs, target stands, and different types of splatter targets. The video appears to be focused on evaluating the performance of this specific ammunition through a controlled test.

This YouTube video features a ballistic gel test of Sig V-Crown 9mm 115gr JHP ammunition. The description lists various equipment used in the video production, including steel targets, cameras, editing software, hearing protection, safety glasses, ballistic gelatin powder, scales, calipers, denim, range finders, chronograph, and various target types. The video aims to showcase the performance of this specific ammunition through controlled testing, providing data on its expansion and penetration characteristics in ballistic gelatin.

This YouTube video features a ballistic gel test comparing two .45 ACP hollow-point ammunition types. The test uses a compact Colt M1991A1 1911 pistol. The description acknowledges potential chronograph errors and emphasizes the comparison of bullet performance in the gel. The creator also mentions an Amazon affiliate storefront and provides disclaimers about safe shooting practices and not selling firearms or ammunition.

This YouTube video features a ballistic gel test comparing two popular 9mm hollow-point ammunition types: Sig V-Crown and Remington Golden Saber. The test is conducted using a Canik TP9SFx pistol, and the ammunition was acquired during a period of shortage. The video emphasizes that all shooting is done on a private range under controlled conditions and does not promote or link to any firearm or ammunition sales. An Amazon affiliate storefront is linked.

This video performs a ballistic gel test and review of Ammo Inc. .40 S&W 180gr ammunition. It includes links to other caliber tests (.308 and .45 ACP), and a comprehensive list of the gear used by the creator, such as steel targets, cameras, editing equipment, hearing protection, safety glasses, ballistic gelatin powder, scales, calipers, chronographs, and various target types. The description also notes the creator is an Amazon Associate earning from qualifying purchases.

This video features a ballistic gel test of the Sig V-Crown .380 90gr JHP ammunition. The content likely focuses on examining the terminal ballistics of this specific self-defense round, including penetration depth, expansion, and retained weight. The description also lists various gear used in the video, suggesting a detailed review approach. The linked pistol review provides context for the ammunition testing.

This video compares the terminal performance of five common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) by shooting watermelons. The test demonstrates a significant increase in destructive power from .22LR up to .45 ACP, with the larger calibers causing more explosive expansion and fragmentation. Specific hollow-point ammunition from Speer, Aguila, and Underwood was used, highlighting the importance of bullet construction for terminal ballistics.

Buckeye Ballistics conducted a comparative test of common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) against concrete blocks. The host, demonstrating significant firearm and ballistics knowledge, emphasized extreme safety precautions due to ricochet risks. The test revealed that while larger calibers showed more damage, none could fully penetrate the concrete block's second wall, suggesting limitations for self-defense scenarios against hardened barriers.

This Taurus TX22 review details its performance with various .22 LR ammunition. While initially reliable with CCI Mini-Mags and cycling standard velocity rounds well, it encountered malfunctions with sub-sonic and high-velocity loads. A catastrophic failure occurred due to a squib load followed by a second shot, resulting in a bulged barrel and damaged magazine.

This video compares the terminal ballistics of .22LR, .22WMR, and .17HMR rimfire cartridges using cantaloupes as targets. The .22LR showed a clean pass-through with minor damage, the .22WMR caused an explosive front-face disintegration, and the .17HMR, despite its speed, disintegrated internally with no exit. The test highlights how different rimfire rounds perform on soft tissue simulants.