Sten MkII vs Ingram M10/9 (w/ John Keene)

Published on December 11, 2024
Duration: 10:42

The Sten MkII is presented as a benchmark for functional submachine guns, with any design failing if it's not clearly superior. The MAC M10/9 is critiqued for its top-heavy feel and poor stock. For range use and hypothetical combat, the Sten is preferred due to easier magazine loading, better parts availability, controllable fire rate, superior sights, and better stock handling. Aftermarket conversions like Lage's have significantly improved the MAC's practicality.

Quick Summary

The Sten MkII is considered the benchmark for functional submachine guns, with any design failing if it's not clearly superior. The MAC M10/9 is critiqued for its top-heavy feel and poor stock. For range use and combat, the Sten is preferred due to easier loading, parts availability, and controllable fire rate.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Sten MkII vs MAC M10/9
  2. 01:11Sten MkII: The Benchmark SMG
  3. 02:01MAC M10/9: Design & Ergonomics
  4. 03:01Range Choice: Sten vs. MAC
  5. 05:31Combat Utility Comparison
  6. 07:01Buying Machine Guns: Factors
  7. 09:01Lage Conversions & MAC Value

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference in handling between the Sten MkII and the MAC M10/9?

The MAC M10/9 is often described as having a top-heavy, 'brick' feel with a poor wire stock. In contrast, the Sten MkII offers better stock handling and is generally considered more controllable, especially in automatic fire, making it preferable for both range use and hypothetical combat scenarios.

Why is the Sten MkII considered a benchmark for submachine guns?

Ian McCollum posits the Sten MkII as the 'floor' of functional submachine guns. The idea is that any subsequent SMG design that isn't clearly superior to the Sten in terms of functionality, reliability, and usability has essentially failed to improve upon the basic requirements.

What advantages does the Sten MkII have over the MAC M10/9 for range use?

For range enjoyment, the Sten MkII is preferred due to its easier magazine loading process, better availability of spare parts, and a slower, more controllable rate of fire. These factors contribute to a more pleasant and manageable shooting experience.

How have aftermarket modifications affected the MAC M10/9?

Richard Lage's aftermarket uppers have significantly increased the MAC M10/9's practicality and market value. These conversions effectively turn the firearm into a more modular system, enhancing its versatility and performance beyond its original design limitations.

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Forgotten Weapons

View all →