Top 5 Guns To Get Rid Of

Published on January 10, 2024
Duration: 4:47

This video identifies five firearms the speaker recommends getting rid of due to practicality, reliability, or safety concerns. It covers the Kel-Tec Sub-2000 for its obsolescence and jamming issues, the Sig Sauer P320 for its drop safety concerns, the Smith & Wesson 500 for its impracticality and high cost, the Arsenal 2011 A1 Double Barrel for its lack of utility, and a political commentary on celebrity bodyguard firearms.

Quick Summary

The Sig Sauer P320 is recommended for disposal due to well-documented drop safety issues. The speaker emphasizes that if a firearm cannot be trusted to be safe, it should not be owned, regardless of manufacturer updates or fixes.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Why Get Rid of Guns?
  2. 01:01Kel-Tec Sub-2000: Obsolete Novelty?
  3. 01:50Sig Sauer P320: Drop Safety Concerns
  4. 02:12Smith & Wesson 500: Impractical Power
  5. 03:00Arsenal 2011 A1: Pointless Design
  6. 03:32Hollywood Bodyguard Guns: Political Critique

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main reasons to get rid of a Kel-Tec Sub-2000?

The Kel-Tec Sub-2000 is recommended for disposal because it's considered obsolete compared to modern AR pistols. It also has a history of jamming issues, making it more of a novelty item than a reliable firearm for practical use.

Why is the Sig Sauer P320 on the list of guns to get rid of?

The Sig Sauer P320 is advised against due to well-documented drop safety issues. The speaker emphasizes that if a firearm cannot be trusted to be safe, it should not be owned, regardless of manufacturer updates or fixes.

Is the Smith & Wesson 500 practical for self-defense?

No, the Smith & Wesson 500 is considered a novelty. Its .500 Magnum caliber is extremely expensive at roughly $3 per round and unpleasant to shoot, with .44 Magnum or .357 Magnum being sufficient for bear country.

What makes the Arsenal 2011 A1 Double Barrel undesirable?

The Arsenal 2011 A1 Double Barrel is seen as a ridiculous concept created simply because it was possible. It offers no practical benefit or functional advantage over standard firearms and is considered a waste of money and time.

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from GFG

View all →