Upgrading the Classic Rhodesian FAL Rifle: Is it Worth It?

Published on June 2, 2023
Duration: 21:04

This review explores upgrading the classic Rhodesian FAL rifle, specifically the DSA SA58 Bush Tracker. While the rifle's historical significance and unique 'cool factor' are acknowledged, its practical utility is questioned compared to modern platforms like the AR-10. Initial accuracy with iron sights was poor, but upgrades like a Primary Arms PLx optic and DSA BRS stock improved groups significantly.

Quick Summary

The DSA SA58 Bush Tracker FAL rifle features a 21-inch 4150 mil-spec barrel with a 1:10 twist. Initial accuracy with iron sights was poor (6.5-7" groups), but upgrades like a Primary Arms PLx optic and DSA BRS stock improved it to 3-3.5" groups at 100 yards.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Intro: FAL Maintenance vs AK-47
  2. 00:57DSA Bush Tracker & Rhodesian Controversy
  3. 03:08Historical Context: Selous Scouts & Camo
  4. 04:35DSA SA58 Bush Tracker Specs
  5. 07:23FAL Ergonomics & Magazine Issues
  6. 10:10Accuracy Test: Iron Sights
  7. 11:42Modernization Upgrades: Optic & Stock
  8. 16:53Final Accuracy & Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key technical specifications of the DSA SA58 21" Bush Tracker Rifle?

The DSA SA58 Bush Tracker features a 21-inch 4150 mil-spec steel barrel with a 1:10 twist, a chrome-lined chamber, and a Type 1 carry handle cut receiver. It uses an adjustable short-stroke piston gas system and glass-filled nylon furniture.

How did the DSA Bush Tracker perform with iron sights during accuracy testing?

Initial accuracy testing with the FAL's iron sights yielded poor results, with groups measuring between 6.5 and 7 inches at 100 yards. The presenter attributed this to the thin top cover and the sight design.

What upgrades were made to the FAL rifle, and how did they affect accuracy?

The FAL was upgraded with a DSA optics-ready rail, a Primary Arms PLx Compact 1-8x24 optic, and a DSA BRS stock. These upgrades improved accuracy to 3-3.5 inch groups at 100 yards.

What are the main ergonomic criticisms of the FAL rifle?

The FAL's ergonomics are criticized for having a stiff trigger and rudimentary iron sights. The presenter also noted challenges with optic height and achieving a proper cheek weld on the platform.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from TFB TV

View all →