Wives Tales and Lies about the M16 / AR15 - Setting the record straight.

Published on January 11, 2024
Duration: 25:57

This video debunks common myths surrounding the M16 and AR-15 rifle platforms, addressing historical issues like early reliability problems caused by improper maintenance and incorrect parts. It clarifies the evolution of the 5.56mm cartridge and the rifle's design, contrasting early models with modern iterations like the M16A4.

Quick Summary

Early M16 reliability issues in Vietnam stemmed from the 'self-cleaning' myth, leading to neglected maintenance and rust. Technical factors like dirty powder and light buffers also contributed. The 5.56mm cartridge was designed for reduced recoil, not to be a 'wound-only' weapon.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to M16/AR15 Myths
  2. 01:44Historical Context and Cartridge Evolution
  3. 04:04Early Reliability and the 'Self-Cleaning' Myth
  4. 07:12Technical Failures: Powder and Buffers
  5. 11:41Debunking the Mattel Manufacturing Myth
  6. 12:53The 'Designed to Wound' and 'Tumbling Bullet' Myths
  7. 17:32Direct Impingement vs. Piston and Conversion Myths
  8. 19:41Evolution to the M16A4

Frequently Asked Questions

What were the main reasons for early M16 reliability issues in Vietnam?

Early M16s faced reliability problems largely because Colt marketed them as 'self-cleaning,' leading troops to forgo cleaning kits. In Vietnam's humid jungle, this caused chambers to rust and extraction failures.

Is it true that Mattel manufactured M16 rifles?

No, the claim that Mattel produced M16 rifles is a persistent myth. The primary manufacturers of the M16 during the Vietnam War were Colt, Harrington & Richardson (H&R), and GM Hydramatic.

What is the difference between early and modern M16/AR-15 buffers?

Early M16s used a 2.0-ounce Edgewater buffer, which was too light and contributed to excessive cyclic rates. Modern buffers typically weigh 5.2 ounces to better manage the rifle's operation and reduce wear.

Was the 5.56mm cartridge designed to be a 'wound-only' weapon?

No, the 5.56mm cartridge was derived from a varmint round to offer reduced recoil and soldier load compared to full-power cartridges. Early performance issues were linked to bullet construction and barrel twist rates, not intentional design for wounding.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Military Arms Channel

View all →