Arken SH-4 Gen II TORTURE TEST!

Published on October 20, 2021
Duration: 16:06

This video details a practical torture test protocol for the Arken SH-4 Gen II 6-24x50 optic. The test involves simulating real-world scenarios like accidental drops from vehicles, onto gravel and blacktop, and from deer stands. The optic's ability to hold zero and withstand impacts is assessed after each stage. A water submersion test is also conducted to check for sealing integrity, with results analyzed to identify potential weaknesses.

Quick Summary

The Arken SH-4 Gen II 6-24x50 optic was subjected to a rigorous torture test, simulating drops from vehicles and deer stands onto various surfaces. Despite significant impacts, the optic largely maintained its zero, allowing for sub-MOA groups. A water submersion test revealed potential seal compromise after abuse, though electronics remained functional.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Optic Torture Test
  2. 00:10Arken SH-4 Gen II Overview
  3. 00:59Testing Fixture Setup
  4. 01:41Practical Real-World Tests
  5. 03:03Test 1: Roof Drop onto Dirt
  6. 04:02Post-Test Zero Check
  7. 05:20Test 2: ATV Drop onto Gravel
  8. 06:47Test 3: Drop onto Blacktop
  9. 08:04Test 4: Deer Stand Drop
  10. 10:04Test 5: Water Submersion
  11. 10:53Water Test Results & Analysis
  12. 11:34Isolating Water Intrusion Variable
  13. 13:35Overall Impact Testing Performance
  14. 14:14Developing a Testing Protocol
  15. 14:55Arken's Performance & Future Improvements
  16. 15:12Future Plans & Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

How was the Arken SH-4 Gen II optic tested for durability?

The Arken SH-4 Gen II underwent a practical torture test simulating real-world scenarios. This included drops from vehicle roofs onto dirt, gravel, and blacktop, as well as a simulated fall from a deer stand. Each impact was followed by a zero check and re-torquing of the mounts.

Did the Arken SH-4 Gen II hold its zero after being dropped?

Yes, the Arken SH-4 Gen II demonstrated impressive zero retention throughout multiple impact tests. Even after significant abuse, it consistently allowed for the printing of sub-MOA groups, indicating robust internal construction.

What was the outcome of the water submersion test on the Arken SH-4 Gen II?

After being subjected to extensive physical abuse, the Arken SH-4 Gen II experienced water intrusion, causing a noticeable shift in the point of impact. However, a separate test on a fresh optic confirmed that the electronics and illumination remained functional.

What is the significance of the testing methodology used for the Arken optic?

The testing methodology focused on practical, real-world scenarios to assess ruggedness. Using a weighted fixture instead of the actual rifle isolated the optic as the variable, and consistent re-torquing ensured repeatable results for accurate comparison across different optics.

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from Iraqveteran8888

View all →