Blackhawk Omnivore & T-Series Holsters

Published on June 7, 2020
Duration: 8:52

This review covers Blackhawk's Omnivore and T-Series holsters, focusing on their utility and limitations. The Omnivore is presented as a universal fit option, particularly for pistols with Streamlight TLR-2 lights, suitable for range work but not recommended for serious use due to trigger access concerns. The T-Series holsters, like the one for a Glock with a TLR-7, are discussed in terms of their retention and mounting systems. A significant critique is the lack of a robust mounting ecosystem compared to competitors like Safariland, with the Module-Lock and Duty Drop/Offset platforms being deemed bulky or difficult to use. While the holsters themselves are functional, the limited mounting options hinder their overall effectiveness for serious applications.

Quick Summary

The Blackhawk Omnivore holster is a universal fit option, but its open design poses a safety risk for serious use as a finger can access the trigger. While cheaper than premium brands, its mounting ecosystem, including the Module-Lock, is criticized for being bulky and lacking versatility compared to systems like Safariland's UBL.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to Blackhawk Holsters
  2. 00:14Blackhawk Omnivore Holster Overview
  3. 00:25Omnivore Fit for TLR-2
  4. 00:46Omnivore Limitations for Serious Use
  5. 01:05Omnivore Thumb Drive Mechanism
  6. 01:24Omnivore TLR-1/TLR-2 Compatibility
  7. 01:42Blade-Tech Tech-Lock Mounting System
  8. 02:13Blackhawk Holster Ecosystem Issues
  9. 02:43Safariland UBL Comparison
  10. 03:01Blackhawk T-Series for TLR-7
  11. 03:25Blackhawk Module-Lock Mounting
  12. 04:00Duty Drop and Offset Platform
  13. 04:46Holster Material Quality
  14. 04:51Paddle vs. Thumb Drive Release
  15. 05:31Thumb Break Mechanism Issues
  16. 06:01Durability and Material Comparison
  17. 06:20Holsters for Custom/Unique Firearms
  18. 06:47Range vs. Serious Holster Use
  19. 07:12Blackhawk's Progress and Future
  20. 07:20Critique of Serpa Holster Technology
  21. 07:40Importance of Mounting Platform Options
  22. 08:01Conclusion and Future Considerations

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main drawbacks of the Blackhawk Omnivore holster for serious use?

The primary drawback of the Blackhawk Omnivore holster for serious use is its open design, which can allow a finger to access the trigger on many pistol models. This makes it unsuitable for tactical applications or concealed carry where accidental discharge is a critical concern.

How does the Blackhawk Module-Lock mounting system compare to other options?

The Blackhawk Module-Lock is described as a bulkier version of the Serpa Tech-Lock. While slightly easier to use than some older systems, it's criticized for its excessive plastic and tendency to position the holster too high on the belt, making it less ideal than more streamlined or adjustable mounting solutions.

What makes Safariland's mounting systems superior to Blackhawk's?

Safariland's mounting systems, like the UBL, are praised for their standardized hole patterns, versatility with belt slides and thigh straps, and various ride height options. This creates a more robust and adaptable ecosystem compared to Blackhawk's limited and often criticized mounting solutions.

Is the Blackhawk Omnivore holster suitable for custom firearms like Polymer 80s?

Yes, the Blackhawk Omnivore can be a good option for custom firearms such as Polymer 80s, especially if finding a perfectly fitted holster is difficult or expensive. It's recommended for range testing and recreational use with such builds where a high level of retention security is not the primary concern.

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from Hop

View all →