Do they send shills better gear or do shills lie?

Published on September 1, 2024
Duration: 6:01

This video addresses the common question of whether firearms manufacturers send 'shills' (influencers) better quality gear than what is available to the public. Ben Stoeger argues that this is generally not the case, citing personal experiences with Staccato pistols and Vortex red dots not exhibiting superior quality control. Instead, he posits that 'shills' often simply refrain from discussing product failures to maintain relationships with manufacturers, creating an illusion of perfection.

Quick Summary

Firearms instructor Ben Stoeger argues that influencers ('shills') generally do not receive gear with superior Quality Control (QC) from manufacturers. The perception of better performance often arises because influencers strategically omit discussions of product failures to maintain relationships and sponsorships, rather than because the gear itself is inherently better.

Chapters

  1. 00:01Introduction: Shill Gear vs. Public Gear
  2. 00:10Question: Higher QC for Influencers?
  3. 00:43Ben Stoeger's Answer: Personal Experience
  4. 01:03Vortex Red Dots Example
  5. 01:34Staccato Pistols Example
  6. 02:08What's Really Happening: Silence on Issues
  7. 02:33The Unspoken Rule: Don't Talk About Problems
  8. 03:03Company Sensitivity & Image Management
  9. 03:25Respecting Honest Feedback Companies
  10. 03:42ADM Rifle Example
  11. 04:15Most Companies Want Perfection
  12. 04:32Why Reviewing Staccato is Fun (for him)
  13. 04:45Relationship Ender: Criticizing Products
  14. 05:05Conclusion: They Don't Get Better Gear, They Lie
  15. 05:17Competition World Example
  16. 05:34Why Opinions Aren't Taken Seriously
  17. 05:51Viewer Question: Do Shills Get Better Stuff?

Frequently Asked Questions

Do firearms manufacturers send influencers better quality gear than the public?

According to firearms instructor Ben Stoeger, manufacturers generally do not send influencers ('shills') gear with a substantially higher level of Quality Control (QC). While some checks ensure production models are sent, the perceived superiority often stems from influencers omitting product failures to maintain relationships, rather than receiving inherently better products.

Why do some gear reviews seem overly positive?

Many online gear reviews appear overly positive because influencers often refrain from discussing any issues or failures they encounter with a product. This silence is a strategic move to preserve their relationships with manufacturers and secure future sponsorships, creating an illusion of perfection.

What is the role of Quality Control (QC) for gear sent to influencers?

When manufacturers send gear to influencers, the primary QC check is typically to ensure they are sending a production model rather than a pre-production unit. There's little evidence to suggest they undergo a more rigorous inspection process than items purchased off the shelf by consumers.

How does transparency affect firearms gear reviews?

Transparency is crucial in firearms gear reviews. Influencers who discuss product flaws honestly, like Ben Stoeger, build trust but may alienate manufacturers. Conversely, those who only highlight positives, often to maintain sponsorships, create a less transparent and potentially misleading view of a product's real-world performance.

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from Ben Stoeger

View all →