History and Development of the GI M16 Magazine

Published on September 2, 2018
Duration: 17:04

This video details the evolution of the US GI M16 magazine, focusing on how changes in ammunition, particularly the M855A1 cartridge, necessitated magazine redesigns. It covers the progression from early black followers to green and tan followers, highlighting feeding issues and the development of the Enhanced Performance Magazine (EPM) with a blue follower to address the M855A1's unique projectile shape and pressure. The video also touches on NATO standardization and the adoption of Magpul PMAGs by the Marine Corps.

Quick Summary

The evolution of US GI M16 magazines was driven by ammunition changes. Early magazines with black followers worked for M193. The M855 cartridge led to green followers. The M855A1 cartridge's high pressure and sharp projectile necessitated the Enhanced Performance Magazine (EPM) with a blue follower and altered feed lips to prevent feeding failures and firearm damage.

Chapters

  1. 00:06Introduction: M855A1 Cartridge Issues
  2. 00:51Original 1970s 30-Round Magazine (Black Follower)
  3. 01:43M16A2 & Green Follower for M855 Cartridge
  4. 02:02Projectile Shape Comparison: M193 vs. M855
  5. 03:28Tan Follower Magazine Issues (circa 2008)
  6. 04:21Real-World Failures of Tan Follower Magazines
  7. 06:01Tan Follower Magazine Halt and Fixes
  8. 07:27Onset of M855A1 Cartridge and its Problems
  9. 08:24Enhanced Performance Magazine (EPM) for M855A1
  10. 09:04EPM vs. Tan Follower: Feed Lip Comparison
  11. 10:23Incompatibility of Old Magazines with M855A1
  12. 10:30NATO Compatibility Issues with M855A1
  13. 11:32Current Ammunition Usage in Armed Forces
  14. 11:56Marine Corps Adoption of Gen 3 PMAG
  15. 13:19Availability of EPM and Gen 3 PMAGs
  16. 14:12Magazine Manufacturers: OK Industries & Brownells
  17. 14:46Purpose of the EPM: M855A1 Ammunition
  18. 15:10M855A1 Penetration vs. M855 and M995
  19. 16:10M855A1 Issues and Branch Adoption
  20. 16:32Future NATO Standardization Concerns

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main issues with the M855A1 cartridge?

The M855A1 cartridge presents significant problems due to its high pressure (60-63,000 psi) and hardened tungsten steel tip. This tip can damage firearm receivers and barrel extensions, and its shape causes feeding failures in older standard magazines.

How did magazine design evolve to address ammunition changes?

Magazine design evolved from early black followers for M193 ammo to green followers for M855 ammo. The M855A1 cartridge necessitated the Enhanced Performance Magazine (EPM) with a blue follower and altered feed lip angles to prevent damage and ensure reliable feeding.

What is the difference between the tan and blue follower magazines?

The tan follower magazine, introduced around 2008, had indexing issues and lacked anti-tilt features. The blue follower in the Enhanced Performance Magazine (EPM) is specifically designed to address the feeding challenges posed by the M855A1 cartridge's projectile shape and pressure.

Why did the US military develop the Enhanced Performance Magazine (EPM)?

The EPM was developed to solve the feeding and damage issues caused by the M855A1 cartridge. Its modified feed lip angle ensures the sharp, hardened projectile tip enters the chamber correctly without impacting the firearm's receiver or barrel extension.

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from SmallArmsSolutions

View all →