How Deadly Is The World's Smallest Gun

Published on September 2, 2024
Duration: 8:12

This video provides a comparative ballistic performance analysis between the NAA Micro Revolver chambered in .22 Short and a standard 9mm handgun. Through tests involving water jugs, car doors, windshields, and meat targets, the video demonstrates the significant differences in penetration, barrier effectiveness, and overall terminal performance. The .22 Short is found to be largely ineffective against barriers and less potent in penetration tests, while the 9mm shows superior performance across most scenarios, highlighting its role as a more capable defensive round.

Quick Summary

The NAA Micro Revolver in .22 Short is largely ineffective for self-defense due to poor barrier penetration and limited stopping power, though it offers minimal recoil and extreme concealability. In ballistic tests, the 9mm consistently outperformed the .22 Short, demonstrating superior effectiveness against barriers like car doors and windshields, and greater terminal ballistics.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: World's Smallest Gun Test
  2. 00:42Power Test: Water Jug Comparison
  3. 01:58Barrier Test: Car Door Penetration
  4. 03:09Barrier Test: Windshield Effectiveness
  5. 04:24Terminal Ballistics: Meat Target Test
  6. 05:46Point Blank Meat Target Shot
  7. 06:18Meat Target Dissection & Analysis
  8. 06:58Summary: Effectiveness and Recommendation

Frequently Asked Questions

How effective is the NAA Micro Revolver (.22 Short) for self-defense?

The NAA Micro Revolver in .22 Short is generally considered ineffective for primary self-defense due to its limited penetration and barrier-defeating capabilities. While it has minimal recoil and is easy to shoot, it lacks the stopping power needed in most defensive scenarios. It might serve as a very close-range 'get off me' gun or a backup to a backup.

What are the key differences in ballistic performance between .22 Short and 9mm?

Ballistic tests show the 9mm significantly outperforms the .22 Short. The 9mm demonstrates superior barrier penetration through car doors and windshields, creates more violent impacts on targets, and transfers more energy. The .22 Short struggles with barriers and offers less terminal effect, though it excels in low recoil and concealability.

Is the NAA Micro Revolver (.22 Short) suitable for concealed carry?

While extremely small and easy to conceal, the NAA Micro Revolver's effectiveness as a concealed carry weapon is highly questionable. Its ballistic performance is significantly limited, making it a poor choice for reliable self-defense. It's better suited as a novelty, a range toy, or a last-resort backup gun with limitations fully understood.

What were the results of the barrier penetration tests for the .22 Short and 9mm?

In barrier tests, the .22 Short failed to penetrate the first layer of a car door and showed minimal effect on a water jug behind a simulated windshield. The 9mm, however, penetrated the car door, burying itself in the seat, and obliterated the water jug behind the windshield, proving far more effective against barriers.

Related News

All News →

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from 704 TACTICAL

View all →